MedTrace Logo

Persona MC Retained PCL vs. Persona Posterior-stabilized vs. NexGen PS

NCT04164147 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2021-08-02

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study compares and evaluates differences in movement analysis, patient-reported outcome and radiological assesment between patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with use of either Zimmer Biomet NexGen and Zimmer Biomet PERSONA

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Total knee replacement

Participant will undergo total knee replacement performed via anterior parapatellar approach with either Posterior Cruciate Ligament sacrificing or retaining implant

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

CT scan

CT scans of the affected knee joint before and after the surgical procedure

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Biomechanics

Participants will be asked to perform biomechanical assesment before and following surgery at baseline, 6-8 weeks and 6-months postoperatively

DEVICE

one of the Persona MC Retained PCL, Persona MC Sacrificed PCL and NexGen PS total knee implant

Participant are randomly allocated to receive one of the Persona MC Retained PCL, Persona MC Sacrificed PCL and the NexGen PS total knee implant for treatment of end-stage knee osteoarthritis.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Medical University of Warsaw

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Artur Stolarczyk, PhD · Medical University of Warsaw

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2020-07-01
Primary Completion
2021-12-01
Completion
2022-12-31

Countries

  • Poland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04164147 on ClinicalTrials.gov