Guided Bone Regeneration Around Immediate Implants
NCT01628367 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 32
Last updated 2017-03-20
Summary
An important result of healing after tooth extraction is a reduction in dimensions of the remaining bone at that site. This reduction of bone volume precludes successful restoration of the space using a dental implant. Bone augmentation has shown promise in clinical reports to reduce this loss of bone volume, thus allowing implant placement and restoration. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of guided bone regeneration around dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets.
Conditions
- Missing Tooth
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Minimally Traumatic Tooth Extraction
The surgeon will perform a minimally traumatic tooth extraction in the following fashion. Intrasulcular incisions will be performed with at 15-C scalpel around the tooth to be extracted. A periotome will then be introduced into the periodontal ligament space in order to sever the subcrestal attachment and expand the periodontal ligament space. Elevators will be used to initiate luxation of teeth. After significant mobility has been achieved through elevation, forceps will be used only to deliver the tooth. Finally, the socket will be curetted to remove all granulomatous tissue and irrigated with sterile isotonic saline solution.
- DEVICE
-
Immediate Implant Placement
A threaded titanium alloy implant with an internal hex connection and a Resorbable Blast Texturing (RBT) surface (Tapered Internal® Implant System, Biohorizons, Inc., Birmingham, AL, USA) will be placed using a surgical guide. Implant diameter of 3.8mm with lengths of either 12 or 15mm will be used. Implants will be placed approximately 3-4mm below the free gingival margin or 2-3mm below the cemento-enamel junction of adjacent teeth.
- BIOLOGICAL
-
Bone Graft Placement
Circumferential defects or dehiscences around the immediately placed implant will be grafted. enCore™ Combination Allograft (Osteogenics Biomedical, Lubbock, Texas, USA) will be used as the bone graft material.
- BIOLOGICAL
-
Membrane placement
A non absorbable d-PTFE membrane (Cytoplast® TXT-200, Osteogenics Biomedical, Lubbock, Texas, USA) will be trimmed to an appropriate size and shape to completely cover the implant site, and extend about 3-5mm beyond on the facial aspect. The membrane will be tucked under the sub-periosteal flap. Care will be taken to ensure that the membrane is resting on bone all around the socket margins. The membrane will be kept a minimum of 1.5mm from the adjacent tooth roots in the interdental area.
- BIOLOGICAL
-
Collagen plug placement
A bio-absorbable collagen wound dressing (CollaPlug®, Zimmer Dental, Carlsbad, CA, USA) will be trimmed to the appropriate size, so as to cover the socket
- DRUG
-
Medications
Patients will be given amoxicillin 500mg 2 days prior to the surgery and will then continue for every 8 hours for 10 days. Patients will also take Ibuprofen 600mg every 6 hours for the first 3 days following the surgery, and then as needed for pain. Patients will also receive a prescription for Vicodin as needed for pain, every 4 to 6 hours
Sponsors & Collaborators
- lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Hom-Lay Wang, DDS,MSD,PhD · Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, The University of Michigan, School of Dentistry
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 100 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2012-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2014-05-31
- Completion
- 2014-05-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Bone Augmentation Techniques in Extraction Sockets
NCT01836783 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Marginal Bone Loss After Immediate Implant Placement in Maxillary Esthetic Zone With Nanobone Versus Xenograft
NCT03536260 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Esthetic With Autogenous Dentin Chips and Immediate Implantation Versus Conventional Immediate Implantation With Xenograft in Thin Buccal Bone
NCT03544580 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Remodeling After Immediate Implant Placement With and Without Bone Grafting
NCT02174198 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Crestal Bone Loss and Patient Satisfaction of Screw Retained Restoration
NCT03671668 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone With and Without Using Autogenous Mixed With Xenograft
NCT04096209 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Three-dimensional Bone Regeneration Using Custom-made Meshes With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT04286334 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Quality and Quantity Following Guided Bone Regeneration Prior to Dental Implant Placement
NCT01603693 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Socket Shield Technique and Guided Bone Regeneration
NCT05990283 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of The Post-Extraction Dimensional Alterations Following Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Partially and Completely Demineralized Dentin Grafts Versus Autogenous Whole-tooth Graft
NCT05766137 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Bone Graft Placement at Implant Installation on Buccal Plate Stability
NCT01245920 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Material's Histomorphometric Analysis In Socket Preservation
NCT06740110 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Post Tooth Extraction Healing Using Different Xenograft Materials
NCT03149172 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement With Immediate Provisionalization Into Extraction Sockets With Labial Plate Dehiscence Defects Within the Maxillary Esthetic Zone
NCT03676244 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Volumetric Analysis of Soft and Hard Tissue Healing for Ridge Preservation and Socket Seal After Tooth Extraction
NCT02844569 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Contour Augmentation by Means of Connective Tissue Grafting Versus Guided Bone Regeneration
NCT05143242 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Freeze-dried Bone Allograft vs Autologous Bone Blocks in the Lateral Augmentation of the Jaws
NCT07104370 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Placement in Mandibular Molar Xenograft Versus PRF
NCT03177356 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Investigate New Surgical Techniques to Improve Esthetics and Patient Satisfaction at Implant Sites
NCT04101552 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Vertical Augmentation Using Onlay Versus Inlay Autogenous Graft With Simultaneous Implant Placement.
NCT03052387 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Regenerative Therapy of Periodontal Bone Defects
NCT03435653 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Dehydrated Human Amnion-Chorion and Type 1 Bovine Collagen Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration
NCT03290638 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Crestal Bone Loss Around Implant With or Without Platform Switching Design
NCT02761226 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft Versus Allogeneic Bone Graft Around Dental Implant in Aesthetic Zone
NCT06773104 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Amnion Chorion Membrane vs. Dense Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane in Ridge Preservation Procedures
NCT02602223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2