Bone Quality and Quantity Following Guided Bone Regeneration Prior to Dental Implant Placement
NCT01603693 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 13
Last updated 2017-11-28
Summary
Amongst the consequences of missing teeth are change of appearance and difficulties in mastication and speech. Dental implants in the maxilla or mandible provide a common treatment modality by offering anchorage to fixed or removable fixtures. In many cases, the lack of teeth is accompanied by lack of appropriate bone volume in the desired area for dental implant placement. Possible causes for this lack of sufficient bone volume are varied and include earlier bone atrophy, traumatic tooth extraction and bone resorption due to periodontal disease. In such cases, dental implant placement is preceded by alveolar bone augmentation . Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) is a common bone augmentation technique in which a bulk of bone substitute is placed in the area which needs more volume before placing a dental implant. The bone substitute is covered with an inert membrane and may provide a scaffold and encourage cells from the patient to reach the area and build new bone volume. A common bone substitute in use for that matter is Deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) which resembles human bone and helps encourage new bone formation. On the contrary its structural stability during placement and early healing is low. Bi-Phasic Calcium-Sulphate is another common bone substitute with easy handling properties and good structural stability during early healing. Its replacement by natural bone contributes to the augmentation process. Although DBBM efficacy in GBR process has been investigated, using DBBM in combination with bi-phasic calcium-sulphate as a binding material during GBR was not examined. This prospective study will examine augmented bone quality and quantity following a GBR procedure with common approved bone substitutes: DBBM (Bio-Oss, Geistlich) alone or in a combination with bi-phasic Calcium-sulphate (BondBone, Augma). The GBR procedures will precede dental implant placement as custom. The quality and quantity of the new formed bone will be assessed by a C.T (computerized tomography) which is done routinely before dental implant placement and by further analyses of bone residues which will follow drilling the dental implant placement site while preparing it (as common).
Conditions
- Resorbed Alveolar Ridge Prior to Dental Implant Insertion
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Bio-Oss (by Geistlich)
Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) will be done with no changes from the common (Dahlin 1988). Patients will be given local anasthesia, full thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be raised to expose the bone area that needs augmentation, bone substitute will be placed over the bony crater and covered with a collagen membrane (Bio-Gide, geistlich, FDA and CE approved). Mucoperiosteal flap will be sutured and patients will be instructed to a check-up routine as accepted after this kind of procedure.
- DEVICE
-
BondBone (by Augma)
Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) will be done with no changes from the common (Dahlin 1988). Patients will be given local anasthesia, full thickness mucoperiosteal flap will be raised to expose the bone area that needs augmentation, bone substitute will be placed over the bony crater and covered with a collagen membrane (Bio-Gide, geistlich, FDA and CE approved). Mucoperiosteal flap will be sutured and patients will be instructed to a check-up routine as accepted after this kind of procedure.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hadassah Medical Organization
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2012-02-29
- Primary Completion
- 2013-02-21
- Completion
- 2013-02-21
Countries
- Israel
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Bond Apatite in Horizontal Augmentation Versus Bio-Oss
NCT06043258 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Using Boned-Apatite Cement at the Time of Extraction for Ridge Preservation at These Sites
NCT02440048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Bone Regeneration Around Immediate Implants
NCT01628367 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of Bone Regenerated With Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) Using Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) Membrane
NCT06186232 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Morphometric, Clinical and Histological Study on One Stage Bone Augmentation Using BoneCeramic (BCP) and Collagen Membranes
NCT00835432 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Guided Bone Regeneration With Customized Titanium Meshes
NCT04480073 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Bone Regeneration for Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation With Double Layer Technique
NCT06139939 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Association of Force Distribution and Bone Resorption
NCT03026894 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Volume Changes After Socket Preservation Using Geistlich Bio-Oss Collagen and Mucograft Seal
NCT03395145 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bone Changes After Immediate Implant Placement or Socket Preservation With or Without Surgical Flap in The Aesthetic Zone
NCT03690973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Impact of a Alveolar Ridge Preservation Technique on the Need of Performing Guided Bone Regeneration for Dental Implant Placement
NCT04299750 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Bone Regeneration With and Without the Use of Intra-marrow Penetrations
NCT06353399 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Bone Regeneration With Custom Made Meshes
NCT04942223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Horizontal Ridge Augmentation With Demineralized Bone Allograft Layered With Xenograft - a Prospective Clinical Study
NCT06342973 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Bone Remodeling After Immediate Implant Placement With and Without Bone Grafting
NCT02174198 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Amnion Chorion Membrane vs. Dense Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane in Ridge Preservation Procedures
NCT02602223 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Peri Implant Soft Tissue Healing in Single Implant Restoration Using Two Different Techniques
NCT02513368 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Different Grafting Strategies
NCT06049823 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
2D/3D Imaging to Analyze the Regeneration Rate of Autologous Bone
NCT06141239 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Two Surgical Techniques for Building up the Bone Where a Dental Implant is to be Placed
NCT06871657 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Clinical Study of the Use of Brushite as Primary Stabilizer in Immediate Dental Implantation
NCT00299585 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Autogenous Tooth Bone Graft Versus Allogeneic Bone Graft Around Dental Implant in Aesthetic Zone
NCT06773104 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reconstruction of Deficient Maxillary Ridges Using Retromolar Blocks With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT06900933 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Horizontal Bone Gain in the Lower Posterior Partially Edentulous Patient Comparing the Stabilization of Membranes With and Without Tacs
NCT06257225 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
An RCT Comparing Xenograft and Allograft for Ridge Preservation
NCT02330523 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA