Narrow Versus Wide Focal Zones for Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal Calculi
NCT01226875 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 275
Last updated 2017-10-06
Summary
Shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is a safe, non-invasive treatment for renal calculi. During SWL energy is focused on in order to break kidney stones and this energy can be varied in size from a narrow (or small) focal zone to a wide (or large) focal zone. This is a multi-centered, randomized study comparing the single treatment success rates of narrow and wide focal zones during SWL.
Conditions
- Kidney Stones
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
SWL: Shock Wave Lithotripsy Intervention
Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is the most common treatment modality for kidney stones. It is a safe and non-invasive treatment performed on patients under intravenous sedation (light anesthesia) on an out-patient basis, whereby shock waves are generated by a source external to the patient's body and are then propagated into the body and focused on a kidney stone. The unique quality of SWL is in its exploitation of shock wave focusing. The Storz lithotripter is an electromagnetic lithotripter with a unique design that allows for a dual focus system with the option of either a narrow (6x28 mm) or wide (9x50 mm) focal zone, depending on the clinical situation. This is the first lithotripter on the market to allow for two different focal zones for shock wave targeting.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Toronto
collaborator OTHER -
University of Western Ontario, Canada
collaborator OTHER -
University of British Columbia
collaborator OTHER -
Unity Health Toronto
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
John Honey, MD · St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto
-
Ken Pace, MD · St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto
-
Ben Chew, MD · University of British Columbia - Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute
-
Ryan Paterson, MD · University of British Columbia - Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute
-
Hassan Razvi, MD · Western University, Canada
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2011-01-31
- Primary Completion
- 2016-11-30
- Completion
- 2017-04-30
Countries
- Canada
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Fluoroscopy Activation Interval in SWL
NCT06689683 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible urétéroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal Calculi
NCT01604304 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Upper Ureteric Stones
NCT02469766 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Antibiotic Prophylaxis Before Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT03692715 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for High Density Renal Stones
NCT04346134 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) on Reducing Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)
NCT01873690 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
(SWL) Versus (ODT) Versus Combined SWL And ODT For Radiolucent Stone
NCT03388060 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Energy Ramping Versus Fixed Dose ESWL
NCT07334236 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Treatment of Kidney Stones
NCT01514032 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Escalating, Constant and Reduction Energy Output in SWL for Renal Stones
NCT02037906 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study on 'The Use of Non-contrast Helical Computerized Tomogram in Predicting Treatment Outcomes of Upper Ureteric Stone by Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Using the Sonolith 4000+ Lithotripter'
NCT00517205 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ultra Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy VS Stented Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Stone Management
NCT05697341 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotriptor Indicated for Fragmenting Urinary Stones in the Kidney
NCT00959153 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT07193940 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Alternating Bidirectional Versus The Standard Approach During Shock Wave Lithotripsy For Renal And Upper Lumbar Ureteric Stones
NCT03243682 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Renal Anatomy on Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcomes for Lower Pole Kidney Stones
NCT01589484 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Flomax to Improve Stone Passage Following Shock Wave Lithotripsy
NCT00209131 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Mini-PNCL vs fURS in Management of Nephrolithiasis
NCT04389853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Adjunct Inversion for Lower Pole Stone
NCT01852669 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Can Shear Wave Elastography Predict the Success of ESWL: a Prospective Study
NCT05995652 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Flexible Ureteroscopy Versus ESWL in the Management of Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT02658942 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Investigate the Effect of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy on Hypertension
NCT03714477 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Different Diameter fURSs With Similar RESDs for the Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones
NCT06987760 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoperative Assessment of of Burst Wave Lithotripsy (BWL)
NCT03873259 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Shockwave Lithotripsy (SWL) Versus SWL and Oral Dissolution Therapy (ODT) For Paediatrics Radiolucent Renal Stone
NCT05896345 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA