Study Comparing CT Scan and Stress Test in Diagnosing Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Hospitalized for Chest Pain

NCT00705458 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 400

Last updated 2015-08-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether coronary artery CT scanning or nuclear stress testing is better at diagnosing chest pain patients with coronary artery disease to select appropriate candidates for coronary catheterization and re-vascularization.

Conditions

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography

64-detector, retrospectively EKG-gated, computed tomography angiography of the coronary arteries during heart rate control (intravenous metoprolol, when necessary)

PROCEDURE

Stress Nuclear Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Usually dual-isotope perfusion imaging at rest (201-Thallium) and at stress (99m-Technetium-MIBI). Some patients will have a 2-day MIBI protocol. Gated SPECT and attenuation-correction images will be obtained. Treadmill stress will be performed. If a patient is unable to exercise, adenosine or dobutamine will be given.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • American Heart Association

    collaborator OTHER
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine

    collaborator OTHER
  • Montefiore Medical Center

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Linda B Haramati, MD, MS · Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine

  • Jeffrey M Levsky, MD, PhD · Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
21 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2008-07-31
Primary Completion
2013-03-31
Completion
2013-12-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT00705458 on ClinicalTrials.gov