Glass Ionomer Restorations With SMART Versus Conventional Treatment in Elderly Cancer Patients
NCT07803757 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40
Last updated 2026-09-04
Summary
This study will evaluate the clinical performance of glass ionomer cervical restorations placed using the Silver-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Technique (SMART) compared with conventional restorative treatment in elderly cancer patients with cervical carious lesions. The trial is a 12-month randomized clinical trial with four parallel arms and a 1:1 allocation ratio. Two SMART arms will receive 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) and potassium iodide followed by either high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (HVGIC) or resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), while the conventional arms will receive standard tooth preparation followed by HVGIC or RMGIC without SDF. The primary outcome is retention of the restoration, assessed using USPHS criteria. Secondary outcomes include postoperative hypersensitivity, marginal integrity, recurrent caries, average duration of treatment, anatomic form, color match, surface roughness, marginal discoloration, and patient satisfaction (VAS). Patients will be followed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. The study aims to determine whether the minimally invasive SMART approach offers comparable clinical performance to conventional treatment while reducing chair time and discomfort in a medically vulnerable elderly cancer population.
Conditions
- Dental Caries
- Cervical Caries
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Silver Diamine Fluoride (SDF, 38%)
38% Silver Diamine Fluoride applied to the carious lesion using a micro brush for one minute, followed by application of potassium iodide (KI) in esthetically sensitive areas to reduce black staining, prior to restoration. Used in the two SMART arms only, with no mechanical removal of carious dentin.
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional Tooth Preparation
Conventional mechanical excavation of carious dentin using sharp hand instruments and round steel burs in a slow-speed handpiece, followed by cavity conditioning with 10% polyacrylic acid, rinsing, and drying, prior to restoration. No SDF is applied in this procedure.
- OTHER
-
High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Cement
High-viscosity glass ionomer restorative cement placed and light-cured according to tooth location, following either SDF application (SMART arm) or conventional mechanical tooth preparation (control arm).
- OTHER
-
Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement
Resin-modified glass ionomer restorative cement placed following either SDF application (SMART arm) or conventional mechanical tooth preparation (control arm).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 35 Years
- Max Age
- 55 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2027-01-15
- Primary Completion
- 2027-07-15
- Completion
- 2028-01-15
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Assessment of Injectable Flowable Composite with Giomer Technology Vs High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations in ART for Cancer Patients
NCT05465369 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Restorative Materials in Restoring Class II Cavities of Primary Molars
NCT06000085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Nanohybrid Resin Composite Lined With PRG Barrier Coat Compared to Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class V Carious Cavities Over 18 Months: Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05605457 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
SMART With Different Modifications in Asymptomatic Deep Carious Lesions of Primary Molars.
NCT06645860 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Reinforced Glass Ionomer Restorations
NCT04288791 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Nano Hydroxyapatite Reinforced Glass Ionomer in Treatment of Root Caries in Geriatric Patients
NCT04701320 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Self-Cure vs. Highly Filled Flowable Composite in Carious Cervical Lesions: 18-Month RCT
NCT07576673 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Giomer Based Injectable Resin Composite Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class V Carious Cavities Over 18-months.
NCT05389163 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two GIC's in the Restoration of Posterior Class II Lesions in the Primary Dentition
NCT05965297 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Alkasite Restoration Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Adult With Class V Carious
NCT04716517 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Glass Ionomer With Glass Hybrid Technology Versus Conventional High Viscosity Glass Ionomer in Class I Cavities of High Caries Risk Patients
NCT02856932 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Assessment of Glass Carbomer Cement
NCT03030690 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effectiveness RMGI and Giomer, Individually and Combined Anterior Cervical Caries
NCT06901453 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of Giomer Based Technology Versus Smart Bioactive Restoration in Carious Class V Cavities
NCT05466461 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bioactive Restorative Materials for Cervical Carious in High Caries Risk Patients
NCT06736964 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Onlay Restorations After Cervical Margin Relocation (CMR)
NCT06155773 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Cervical Restorations Performance Using Modified Universal Adhesive
NCT05509127 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Evaluation of Low-shrinkage Giomer Versus Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer in Cervical Caries Lesions: A Clinical Trial
NCT05930548 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
18-Month Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer Compared to Conventional Flowable Giomer in Carious Cervical Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06946134 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Zirconomer-P Versus RMGI for Proximal Restorations in Primary Molars
NCT07788274 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Molars Restorations With Encapsulated or Hand-Mixed Glass Ionomer: Clinical Trial
NCT02274142 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Zirconia-Reinforced Glass Ionomer Versus Injectable Giomer in Class V Restorations
NCT07731308 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Sectional Matrix Versus Circumferential Matrix for Reproduction of Proximal Contact
NCT03795727 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Giomer vs Glass Ionomer Cement for ART Occlusoproximal Restorations: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT02962713 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Highly Translucent Nano Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Filling Versus Conventional Resin Composite Restorations in Patients With Proximal Carious Teeth. (A One-year Randomized Clinical Trial).
NCT05403008 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA