BurstDR Spinal Cord Stimulation Versus Sham in Established Responders
NCT07779733 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 28
Last updated 2026-08-21
Summary
This study aims to determine whether ongoing BurstDR spinal cord stimulation (SCS) provides pain relief beyond sham stimulation in patients with chronic pain who are established responders to BurstDR therapy.
Participants already implanted with an SCS system and experiencing stable clinical benefit from BurstDR will undergo both active stimulation and sham stimulation in a randomized, double-blind crossover design. Each participant will therefore serve as their own control.
The primary question is whether pain intensity is lower during active BurstDR stimulation compared with sham stimulation. The study will also evaluate treatment satisfaction, patient-reported changes in sleep, mood, daily activity and social activity, the effectiveness of blinding, and short-term safety and tolerability.
Conditions
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
BurstDR Spinal Cord Stimulation
Active BurstDR spinal cord stimulation is delivered for 7 consecutive days using each participant's established clinically effective stimulation settings. Electrode configuration, pulse pattern, pulse width, frequency structure, and amplitude are maintained according to the participant's established therapeutic program, with any adjustment required to maintain imperceptible stimulation completed before the randomized treatment periods.
- DEVICE
-
Sham Spinal Cord Stimulation
During sham stimulation, the implanted spinal cord stimulation system remains in place but stimulation output is switched off for 7 consecutive days. The participant-facing programmer is locked and visible device information that could reveal treatment allocation is masked. Study contacts, diary assessments, and follow-up procedures are otherwise equivalent to those during active stimulation.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Umeå University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Pedram Tabatabaei, MD, PhD · Umeå University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-09-30
- Primary Completion
- 2026-12-31
- Completion
- 2027-03-31
Countries
- Sweden
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Spinal Cord Stimulation vs. Medical Management for Low Back Pain (DISTINCT)
NCT04479787 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation (Burst-SCS) Study
NCT03718325 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Burst Optimized Stimulation Study
NCT02896361 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
BurstDR™ micrOdosing stimuLation in De-novo Patients
NCT03350256 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Active Versus Passive Recharge Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation on Pain Experience in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2: a Multicenter Randomized Trial (BURST-RAP Study)
NCT05421273 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of 1000 Hertz (Hz), Burst, and Standard Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Relief
NCT02902796 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Placebo Effect In Spinal Cord Electrical Stimulation for Pain
NCT06585033 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Intraspinal Nerve Root Stimulation With Dorsal Column Stimulation
NCT00370773 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The True Efficacy of Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Intractable Low Back Pain (TRU-BURST)
NCT06030284 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain
NCT01486108 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Experience Comparing Tonic Vs. Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation For Chronic Pain
NCT04159753 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Neck and Upper Limb Pain Using BurstDR (De Ridder) Stimulation
NCT03159169 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
High-frequency Alternating Current Stimulation for Neurophatic Pain in Spinal Cord Injury
NCT07359677 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study on the Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Severe Refractory Primary or Secondary RLS
NCT07571733 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Acute and Chronic Repercussion of Spinal Cord Stimulation After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT07210411 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study to Characterize Effects of Programming in SCS Patients Undergoing a Temporary Trial
NCT02988713 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Change in Pain and Quality of Life Following SCS for Chronic Pain
NCT03421951 ·Status: TERMINATED
-
Mechanisms and Outcome-Prognostication for Paresthesia-based and -Free Spinal Cord Stimulation
NCT03852381 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Analgesic Efficacy of High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation
NCT01400282 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Refractory Pain Randomized Controlled Trial: the PAcStim RCT
NCT07468591 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
PET Patterns, Biomarkers and Outcome in Burst SCS Treated FBSS Patients
NCT03419312 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
ARC Therapy to Restore Hemodynamic Stability and Trunk Control in People With Spinal Cord Injury
NCT05941819 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Spinal Cord Stimulation Efficacy Measures
NCT00351208 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
A Novel Approach in Spinal Cord Stimulation: a Combination of Burst and Tonic Waveforms.
NCT03201705 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Multichannel Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation With Core Exercise for Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT07760142 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA