Effects of Active Versus Passive Recharge Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation on Pain Experience in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2: a Multicenter Randomized Trial (BURST-RAP Study)
NCT05421273 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 96
Last updated 2024-11-19
Summary
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has shown to be an effective treatment for patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome Type 2 (PSPS Type 2). The method used to deliver electrical charge in SCS is important. One such method is burst stimulation. Two variations of burst waveforms are currently in use: one that employs active recharge and one that uses passive recharge. It is still unknown if there are clinical differences between active recharge and passive recharge burst SCS. To date, no clinical studies have been performed that directly compared these two burst stimulation waveforms. The objective of this Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) is to assess and compare effect of passive recharge burst SCS with active recharge burst SCS on pain relief and motivational-emotional facets of pain
Conditions
- Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2
- Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Spinal cord stimulation using passive recharge burst stimulation
Passive recharge burst is marked by a recharge pattern that passively compensates for charge differences.
- DEVICE
-
Spinal cord stimulation using active recharge burst stimulation
Active recharge burst is characterized by negative pulses that directly compensate for charge differences.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Rijnstate Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-02-16
- Primary Completion
- 2025-12-31
- Completion
- 2026-06-30
- FDA Device
- Yes
Countries
- Netherlands
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Percutaneous Neuromodulation Therapy (PNT) With Chronic Low Back Pain Patients
NCT00290238 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Tonic Versus Burst DR(TM) Epidural Motor Cortex Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain
NCT05984329 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Study on the Efficacy of Non-invasive Spinal Cord Electrical Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain
NCT07046143 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Cutaneous Silent Period-Based Comparison of DRG-PRF and TFESI in Lumbar Radicular Pain
NCT07097532 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness Analysis of Ultrasound-guided Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis (EPI) in Patient With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT04290221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Electrical Intra-cutaneous Half-sine Stimulation for Optimized Preferential C-fiber Activation
NCT05440266 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Pulse Width With Spinal Cord Stimulation
NCT00399516 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Understanding the Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation for Treatment of Chronic Pain
NCT05555485 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Pulse Radiofrequency Durations in Lumbosacral Pain
NCT06748469 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effects of Non Invasive Brain Stimulation During Prolonged Experimental Pain
NCT04246853 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Which Type of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation is More Effective in Myofascial Pain Syndrome?
NCT04645095 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Determination of a Proper Needle Entry Point; Effects of Skin Compression With an Indicator on Radiation Exposure Time of Fluoroscopically Guided Transforaminal Epidural Block in Obese Patients
NCT02281227 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Superiority Trial of Radiofrequency Ablation for Low Back Pain
NCT07222462 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Predicting Outcome of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator (TENS) in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
NCT01185665 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of PEMF in Patients With Chronic Radicular Pain Due to Lomber Disc Herniation
NCT04049812 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Predicting Central Pain Among People With a Spinal Cord Injury by Evaluating Mechanisms Regulating Pain and Efficacy Testing of the TENS Apparatus
NCT01726881 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Research on the Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of JHG002 Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07304076 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Wearable Focused Ultrasound Stimulation for Peripheral Nerve Pain Management
NCT07160049 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Thoracolumbar Fascia Mobilization and Ultrasound-Guided 5% Dextrose Injection in Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT07241559 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Ultrasound Versus Short Wave Diathermy in the Treatment of a Slipped Disc of the Lower Back
NCT03835182 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Pain Relief During the Active Phase of Labor
NCT01600495 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Does Trans-Cutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Alleviate The Pain Experienced During Bone Marrow Sampling?
NCT02005354 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and Low Back Pain
NCT05812885 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessing Spinal Pain With an Artificial Intelligence-assisted Whole Body Electrical Stimulation Device
NCT07244237 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Percutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT04243915 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA