Evaluation the Accuracy of Immediate Implant Placement Using SocketFit Static Surgical Guide Versus Conventional Static Surgical Guide in Anterior Esthetic Zone
NCT07760974 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 26
Last updated 2026-08-13
Summary
This study compares two types of surgical guides used during immediate dental implant placement in the upper front teeth. One guide is a conventional static surgical guide, while the other is a modified SocketFit static surgical guide designed to improve stability after tooth extraction. The purpose of the study is to determine whether the SocketFit guide improves the accuracy of implant placement.The findings may help improve the precision and predictability of immediate dental implant treatment in the anterior esthetic zone.
Conditions
- Conventional Static Surgical Guide
- SocketFit Static Surgical Guide
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
SocketFit Static Surgical Guide
Participants will undergo immediate implant placement in the anterior esthetic zone using the SocketFit static surgical guide. The guide incorporates a socket-engaging extension designed to enhance guide stability and drilling accuracy following atraumatic tooth extraction. Implant placement will be performed according to the planned digital workflow.
- DEVICE
-
Conventional Static Surgical Guide
Participants allocated to the control group will undergo immediate implant placement in the anterior esthetic zone using a conventional tooth-supported static surgical guide designed through the standard digital workflow. Following atraumatic tooth extraction, the guide will be seated on the remaining teeth to direct sequential osteotomy preparation and implant placement according to the preoperative virtual implant plan. All other surgical procedures, implant system, drilling protocol, and postoperative management will be identical to those used in the experimental group.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Tanta University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Aliaa s. Kishk, Batchelor · Tanta University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 35 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-07-31
- Completion
- 2027-07-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Classifying Fully Guided Surgical Guides
NCT06947057 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Fully Guided Dental Implant Placement by Experienced and Novice Clinicians Using Different Surgical Guides
NCT07112664 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Fully Guided Dental Implant Placement and Primary Stability
NCT07149987 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Versus Socket Shield Technique In Immediately Placed Implants
NCT06478511 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Peri Implant Soft Tissue Esthetics With Immediate Temporization With and Without Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft
NCT03770975 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Computer Guided Versus Free Hand Immediate Implant Placement
NCT03230500 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Socket Sealing Abutment With Immediate Implant
NCT07748494 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Socket Shield Technique With Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone
NCT05409950 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of AI Assisted Surgical Guide (AISG)
NCT07711613 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
An Immediate Implant Will be Placed Using the MiniNaviDent System and Static Guide. A Postoperative CBCT Scan Will Then be Acquired and Superimposed Onto the Preoperative CBCT Scan to Assess and Compare Implant Deviation Relative to the Preoperative Plan
NCT07380360 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Two Placement Concepts of Six Compressive
NCT07495488 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Socket Shield With Immediate Implant Stability
NCT04882761 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Autogenous Soft Tissue Grafts for Primary Closure Over Immediately Placed Dental Implants
NCT07327047 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Zygomatic Implant Placement Accuracy Using Fully Metallic vs Resin-based Static Surgical Guides in Severely Atrophic Maxilla
NCT07551024 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Facial Gingival Level Evaluation Following Soft Tissue Augmentation Using CTG Around Immediate Dental Implants vs Immediate Dental Implants Alone in the Esthetic Zone.
NCT03334994 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparing Dynamic Navigation to Static Navigation in the Implant Placement
NCT07291336 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparative Clinical Study for Two Types of Locator Attachments for Mandibular Implant Supported Overdenture
NCT06109519 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Socket Shield Technique Versus Early Implant Placement With Contour Augmentation
NCT05261334 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Selective Laser Sinteredcomputer Guided Stents Versus Digital Light Processing Stents
NCT03287934 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
DLP Versus SLM Stackable Surgical Guide
NCT05617443 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Guided Ridge Splitting With Simultaneous Implant Placement
NCT06333912 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dimensional Changes of the Labial Alveolar Ridge After Socket Shield Technique With Computer Guided Root Sectioning
NCT05366985 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Placement in Horizontally Deficient Maxillary Aesthetic Zone With Simultaneous Soft Tissue Augmentation
NCT05274256 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Implants Immediately Installed in Esthetic Area With Computer-guided Surgery
NCT03986164 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy in Computer Guided Versus Free Hand Immediate Implantation
NCT03281148 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA