Evaluation of Zygomatic Implant Placement Accuracy Using Fully Metallic vs Resin-based Static Surgical Guides in Severely Atrophic Maxilla
NCT07551024 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 4
Last updated 2026-05-07
Summary
Some patients lose a large amount of bone in the upper jaw. When this happens, it can be difficult to place regular dental implants. In these cases, special implants called zygomatic implants can be used. These implants are longer than normal implants and are fixed in the cheekbone, which usually has enough bone to support them. They can help support fixed teeth for patients with severe bone loss in the upper jaw.
Placing zygomatic implants requires careful planning and high accuracy. To help guide the surgeon during the operation, a surgical guide can be used. A surgical guide is a custom-made device that helps the surgeon place the implant in the planned position.
Surgical guides can be made from different materials. The most common type is made from resin (a strong plastic material) using 3D printing. Recently, fully metallic surgical guides have been developed. These metal guides may be stronger and more stable during surgery, but it is not yet clear if they improve the accuracy of implant placement.
The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of metal surgical guides and resin surgical guides when placing zygomatic implants in patients with severe bone loss in the upper jaw.
Patients included in the study will undergo a clinical examination and a CT scan before surgery to plan the implant positions. During the surgery, each patient will receive zygomatic implants on both sides of the upper jaw. On one side, the implants will be placed using a metal surgical guide, and on the other side, they will be placed using a resin surgical guide. This allows the two types of guides to be compared in the same patient.
After the surgery, another CT scan will be taken to check the final position of the implants. The planned implant position will be compared with the actual position after surgery to measure the accuracy of placement.
The results of this study will help determine whether metallic surgical guides or resin surgical guides provide better accuracy when placing zygomatic implants.
Participation in this study is voluntary. All patients will receive full information about the study and will sign a consent form before participating.
Conditions
- Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla
- Zygomatic Implants
- Guided Surgery
- Dental Implant
- Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Resin surgical Guide
Before surgery, a CT scan and a digital impression of the mouth will be taken. A resin surgical guide (made with biocompatible 3D-printed material) will be created to guide the implant placement. On the assigned side, the zygomatic implant will be placed using this resin guide.
- DEVICE
-
Group B (Metallic nickel Guide)
CT scan and digital planning will be used. A metallic surgical guide (made of nickel using CAD/CAM technology) will be created. , the zygomatic implant will be placed using this metallic guide on one side.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Future University in Egypt
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
ramy ragab el beialy, proffessor · cairo university in egypt
-
mohamed safwat eid, bachelor · future unversity in egypt
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-11-03
- Primary Completion
- 2026-06-30
- Completion
- 2026-06-30
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Non Grafted Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation With Implant Placement Versus the Use of Short Endosseous Implants
NCT03661957 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Digital Assessment of Mandibular Flexure in Full Arch Fixed Restorations
NCT05617274 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Reliability of All on 4 Using 2 Zygomatic and 2 Conventional Implants vs All on 4 Implants for Rehabilitation of Maxilla
NCT05108324 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Delayed Dental Implant Placement After Socket Preservation Using Injectable Bone Graft
NCT07373600 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Z-shaped Bone Plates in Management of Mandibular Fractures
NCT07184762 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Deproteinized Bovine Bone for Immediate Implants Placement in Maxillary Esthetic Zone.
NCT07569146 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Horizontal Bone Gain in the Lower Posterior Partially Edentulous Patient Comparing the Stabilization of Membranes With and Without Tacs
NCT06257225 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement With Provisionalization Using Different Bone Grafts as a Space Filling Material in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone
NCT03741036 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Pterygoid Implant
NCT07016828 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bone Height Gain Following Trans-crestal Sinus Floor Elevation
NCT05411510 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Radiographic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Xenograft as a Socket Preservation Material in Maxillary Posterior Teeth.
NCT07250256 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Computer Guided Simultaneous Implant Placement With Tri-cortical Ridge Augmentation Using Chin Cortical Bone Struts in Anterior Atrophic Maxilla: A Case Series
NCT05731063 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Guided Tissue Regeneration With Autogenous Bone Chips and CGF During Implant Placement
NCT07521514 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Assessment of All Ceramic Single-retainer Using Upper Canine as Abutment With Minimum Preparation on the Lingual Surface, to Replace the Upper Lateral Incisor and Will be Compared With the All Ceramic Single-retainer Using Upper Central Incisor.
NCT05812066 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Implants Placed Without Bone Grafts in Two Different Sinus Floor Elevation Techniques.
NCT04309682 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Crestal Bone Loss Around Implant With or Without Platform Switching Design
NCT02761226 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Prosthetic Rehabilitation of Thin Wiry Ridge by Ridge Splitting and Simultaneous Implants Placement
NCT06274476 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Non-grafted Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation With Simultaneous Implant Placement Using Different Implant Lengths
NCT03731650 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Placement With Corticocancellous Bone Block vs Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix in Maxillary Sinus Lifting
NCT06073912 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Density and Marginal Bone Height Changes Around Dental Implants
NCT06151314 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Crestal Sinus Technique Using Autologous Fibrin Glue Vs Sticky Bone With Simultaneous Implant Insertion.
NCT05613335 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Mixture of Autogenous and Xenograft Particulate Versus Patient-Specific Sticky Bone for Horizontal Anterior Maxillary Defect
NCT07113886 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Computer Guided Versus Conventional Augmentation Using Bone Ring
NCT03049137 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment Crestal Maxillary Sinus Membrane Elevation Using Different Implant Heights
NCT05166434 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
Marginal Bone Changes of CAD/CAM Implant Supported Screw-retained and Screw-mented Metal Frameworks
NCT04722744 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA