Bundle Branch Pacing to Preserve Ejection Fraction in Atrial Fibrillation Trial
NCT07759700 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 642
Last updated 2026-08-12
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether left bundle branch area pacing, a technique designed to activate the heart's natural electrical conduction system, is better than conventional right ventricular pacing in adults with permanent atrial fibrillation, preserved heart pumping function, and a need for a pacemaker.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does left bundle branch area pacing reduce the risk of death, unplanned hospitalization for heart failure, or the need to replace the initial pacing system with biventricular pacing over 2 years? Does it better preserve heart function and quality of life, without increasing pacemaker-related complications?
Researchers will compare left bundle branch area pacing with conventional right ventricular pacing. A total of 642 participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of these two pacing strategies.
Participants will:
Have a single-chamber pacemaker implanted using either left bundle branch area pacing or conventional right ventricular pacing Undergo electrocardiograms, echocardiograms, and pacemaker checks during 2 years of follow-up Attend follow-up visits approximately 2, 12, and 24 months after implantation Be contacted by telephone approximately 6 and 18 months after implantation Complete questionnaires about their health and quality of life at the beginning and end of the study
Conditions
- Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
- Preserved Ejection Fraction
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
LBBA pacing
The LBBA pacing group will be composed of patients randomized to receive a single chamber pacemaker with a ventricular lead implanted in the LBBA of the cardiac conduction system through the interventricular septum.
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional pacing
The conventional pacing group will be composed of patients randomized to receive a single chamber pacemaker with a ventricular lead implanted either at the apex or the septum of the right ventricle.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University Hospital, Grenoble
collaborator OTHER -
Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises, Nantes
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
collaborator OTHER -
Centre Hospitalier de PAU
collaborator OTHER -
Centre Cardiologique du Nord, St Denis
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
collaborator OTHER -
LA ROCHE SUR YON HOSPITAL
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans
collaborator OTHER -
University Hospital, Tours
collaborator OTHER -
Poitiers University Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 90 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-09-15
- Primary Completion
- 2028-08-14
- Completion
- 2030-08-14
More Related Trials
-
Left Bundle Branch Pacing vs Right Ventricular Pacing on AHRE Burden in Patients With Preserved LVEF
NCT07250529 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cardiac ResynchrOniSation Via Stimulation of the LEFT Bundle in AF Patients.
NCT05162716 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Safety, Performance, and Clinical Benefit of Pacing the Left Bundle Branch Area - Post-Market Clinical Follow-up
NCT07209852 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT04110431 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
B-Left HF: Biventricular Versus Left Univentricular Pacing With Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD) Back-Up in Heart Failure Patients
NCT00187213 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
LBBP as Initial Therapy in Patients With Non-ischemic Heart Failure and LBBB
NCT05572957 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Acute Effects of LBBP Versus BVP for CRT
NCT04505384 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cardiac Anodal Biphasic Pacing
NCT07173777 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Effectiveness of Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Cardiac Dysfunction and AV Block
NCT05553626 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Prospective ranDomized Trial to Evaluate the Non-inferiority of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Vs Cardiac ResynchronIzatioN Therapy With ECG guIded AV Optimization
NCT07107048 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Beat-to-beat Evaluation of Atrial Pacing to Test Fluid Responsiveness
NCT07730242 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Advancing Clinical Heart Failure Outcomes Leveraging Defibrillation Lead Implant System for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing
NCT07526896 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP) PMCF Study
NCT07217392 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
LEft Bundle branchArea Pacing to Avoid Pacing-induced CARdiomyopathy
NCT05910866 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Protection of Cardiac Function With Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Block
NCT04624763 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pacing for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
NCT01045291 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study of LBBP
NCT04919447 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
LEft Atrial Pacing in Diastolic Heart Failure
NCT01618981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Moderato System in Patients With Hypertension
NCT03757377 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Bi-ventricular Epicardial Activation in Left Bundle Area Pacing: a Comparison Study
NCT05401851 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
LBBP + CSP Versus LBBP Alone for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT07664189 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Application of Right Atrial Left Ventricular Fusion Pacing in Patients With CRT Indications
NCT03071978 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Conventional Pacing in Atrioventricular Block
NCT05129098 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Left vs Left Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05650658 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Accelerated LBBP for Patients With RHF and Severe TR
NCT07470047 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA