Clinical Prospective ranDomized Trial to Evaluate the Non-inferiority of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Vs Cardiac ResynchronIzatioN Therapy With ECG guIded AV Optimization
NCT07107048 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 194
Last updated 2025-08-06
Summary
Cardiac resynchronization therapy is the gold standard therapy for patients with advanced HF left ventricle dysfunction and large QRS.
Recently left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) or left bundle optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy has been proposed as a rescue therapy for failed or unsuccessful CRT. LBBAP has been also proposed as a physiological pacing modality for patient who need permanent ventricular pacing as an alternative to conventional right ventricular pacing.
Several observational studies have demonstrated the feasibility of this technique due to an ease procedure, stable and appropriate electrical measurements and clinical benefit in terms of patients outcomes.
Furthermore, It is well known that an optimized AV delay (AVD) can improve clinical outcomes preserving a physiological diastolic function.
In clinical practice several different AVD optimization methods have been developed in the last few years.
The majority of them use the intracardiac electrograms during the implant procedure to evaluate QRS duration and AV delay or at follow-up through echocardiographic measurements.
Aim of our pilot project is to assess the non-inferiority of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with ECG/Echo guided AV optimization.
Conditions
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Pacemaker and defibrillator
Patients will be randomly assigned at enrollment (1:1) to undergo either LBBAP or CRT with biventricular stimulation. The devices implanted maybe defibrillators or pacemekers.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
National association Cardiovascular innovation
collaborator UNKNOWN -
Leonardo Calò, MD
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-10-30
- Primary Completion
- 2027-04-30
- Completion
- 2027-10-30
Countries
- Italy
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Impact of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Pacing in Atrioventricular Block (LEAP-Block)
NCT04730921 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Left Bundle Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Trial
NCT05434962 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
LEft Atrial Pacing in Diastolic Heart Failure
NCT01618981 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Left Ventricular Pacing to Avoid Cardiac Enlargement Study
NCT01302717 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Left vs Left Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05650658 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Comparison of Endocardial Versus Epicardial - From the Coronary Sinus - Left Ventricular Pacing for Resynchronization in Heart Failure.
NCT01260402 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Left Ventricular Septum Pacing in Patients by Transvenous Approach Through the Inter-ventricular Septum
NCT01609738 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Safety and Effectiveness of Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Cardiac Dysfunction and AV Block
NCT05553626 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
RESynchronisation in Patients With Heart Failure and a Normal QRS Duration
NCT00480051 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Left Ventricular Septal Pacing: Potential Application for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT03415945 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Conduction System Pacing With Left Bundle Branch Pacing as Compared to Standard Right Ventricular Pacing
NCT05015660 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Pacing the His Bundle in Heart Failure
NCT04701112 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
AI-Guided Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing
NCT07206602 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
His-bundle Pacing vs. Right Ventricular Apical Pacing in Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction
NCT04529577 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients After TAVR
NCT05024279 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Direct HIS-pacing as an Alternative to BiV-pacing in Symptomatic HFrEF Patients With True LBBB
NCT03614169 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Selected Site Pacing to Avoid Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Cardiac Resynchronization Patients With Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads
NCT01484613 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Investigation of Transvenous Versus Epicardial Left Ventricular Stimulation Technique
NCT00819117 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Right Ventricular Septal Versus Apical Pacing: Echocardiographic Study
NCT06045143 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Conventional Pacing in Atrioventricular Block
NCT05129098 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Electrical Resynchronization and Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Direct His Bundle Pacing Compared to Biventricular Pacing
NCT03452462 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Endocardial Pacing in On-table Non-responders in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT01193712 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Right Ventricular Septal Pacing for the Prevention of Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients With Atrio-Ventricular Block
NCT00709774 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Role of Left Ventricular Pacing Site
NCT00221780 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Direct HIS/LBB Pacing as an Alternative to Biventricular Pacing in Patients With HFrEF and a Typical LBBB.
NCT04409119 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA