MedTrace Logo

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Using Conventional Stylet-driven Pacemaker Leads for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

NCT05365568 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 170

Last updated 2024-09-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study proposal is to compare the effectiveness of two distinct pacing modalities for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Our primary hypothesis is that left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) using conventional stylet driven pacemaker leads is an effective resynchronization method that yield to at least similar clinical benefits and outcomes when compare to biventricular pacing.

Conditions

  • Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP)

Left bundle branch area pacing using conventional stylet driven pacemaker leads for cardiac resynchronization therapy

PROCEDURE

Biventricular pacing (BiV)

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing (BiV)

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • AZ Sint-Jan AV

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jean-Benoît le Polain de Waroux, MD, PhD · AZ Sint Jan Brugge AV

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2022-09-01
Primary Completion
2025-09-30
Completion
2028-09-30

Countries

  • Belgium

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05365568 on ClinicalTrials.gov