Evaluation of Two Pit and Fissure Sealants Treated by Two Remineralizing Agents in Resin Restorations
NCT07705633 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 44
Last updated 2026-07-15
Summary
The study aimed to assess the clinical evaluation of two different types of pit and fissure sealants after treating with two different remineralizing agents in preventive resin restorations.
Primary objectives:
Assessment of retention rate and marginal integrity of two types of pit and fissure sealants when using two types of remeneralizing agents using Ryge's criteria and Simonsen's criteria.
Secondary objectives:
Assessment of stability of results after 3, 6 and 9months.
Conditions
- Retention
- Fissure Sealants
- Resin
- Pit and Fissure Sealants
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Group 1 :Teeth treated with Fisseal, Promedica Dental Material GmbH after treating with Biflourid
Teeth treated with Fisseal, Promedica Dental Material GmbH after treating with Biflourid 10, Voco, Germany
- DEVICE
-
Group 2 :Teeth treated with Fisseal, Promedica Dental Material GmbH after treating with MI Paste
Group 2 (G2): Teeth treated with Fisseal, Promedica Dental Material GmbH after treating with MI Paste, GC AmericaC America
- DEVICE
-
Group 3 : Teeth treated with prevent seal, Itena, North America after treating with Biflourid
Group 3 (G3): Teeth treated with prevent seal, Itena, North America after treating with Biflourid 10, Voco, Germany
- DEVICE
-
Group 4 : Teeth treated with prevent seal, Itena, North America after treating with MI Paste
Group 4 : Teeth treated with prevent seal, Itena, North America after treating with MI Paste
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ismail Dahshan
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 15 Years
- Max Age
- 40 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2026-01-01
- Completion
- 2026-01-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Efficiency of Bioactive Pit and Fissure Sealant
NCT06493942 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Retention of Flowable Resin With Sprg and of a Flowable Resin in First Permanent Molars
NCT04701294 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Sealing of Initial Occlusal Caries Using Fissure Sealants
NCT05891288 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Resin Based and Glass Ionomer Based Hydrophilic Fissure Sealants
NCT05127343 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Resin Sealants: Retrospective Cohort Study
NCT02649816 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Retention Rate of Self-etch Resin Based Sealant With and Without Prior Sandblasting
NCT04929327 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of Fluoride Varnish Versus Resin Based Sealant
NCT04603573 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
"Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Pit and Fissure Sealants on Permanent First Molar Teeth in Children."
NCT05791682 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of Fluoride Varnish Versus Resin Based Sealant (Part 2)
NCT04793256 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention and Caries Prevention of Giomer Sealant With or Without Diode Laser Pre-treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07612540 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Glass Ionomer Sealant Versus Resin Sealant for Pits and Fissures of the First Permanent Molars
NCT05988801 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparative Evaluation of the Role of Self-Adhesive Flowable Composite in Enhancing Sealant Retention Versus Conventional Pits and Fissure Sealant With and Without Fissurotomy in Permanent Molars
NCT07399340 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Follow Up of a Fissure Sealant Placed With Different Adhesive Protocols: 2-Year Randomized Split Mouth Study
NCT02998814 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Giomer Preceded by Etching Versus Resin-Based Sealants Applied on Permanent Molars Affected by Molar-Incisor Hypo-mineralization
NCT06922552 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Pre-etched Bioactive Versus Resin- Based Fissure Sealant for Permanent Molars Affected With Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH).
NCT07504614 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of Pits and Fissure Sealants on Non Carious vs Initial Carious Enamel Lesions in Posterior Teeth
NCT07330089 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
The Effect of an Adhesive System on the Retention and Caries Prevention for Fissure Sealants in Permanent Molars
NCT06608563 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Partially Erupted First Molars
NCT07052526 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Pit and Fissure Sealants
NCT06987955 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Retention of Bonded Amalgam Sealants Versus Resin-based Sealants
NCT03130725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
An Implementation Strategy for the Adoption of an Evidence-Based Guideline for Pit-and-Fissure Sealants
NCT04682730 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fissure Sealant Retention Trial
NCT00873990 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Efficacy of Sealing Molars: Split-mouth Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03819868 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Outcome of Pulpotomy on Immature Permanent Molars Between Different Calcium Silicate-based Materials : a 12 Months Clinical Study
NCT07350746 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Fluoride Concentration in Inter-proximal Fluid From Dental Sealants
NCT01588210 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA