Clinical Follow Up of a Fissure Sealant Placed With Different Adhesive Protocols: 2-Year Randomized Split Mouth Study
NCT02998814 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 24
Last updated 2016-12-20
Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the retention rates of a fissure sealant placed using different adhesive protocols over 24 months.Twenty-four subjects with no restoration and caries received fissure sealants (Clinpro™Sealant, 3M/ESPE) placed with different adhesive protocols. A total of 292 sealants (73 for each group) were placed. The sealants were placed as follows; a-without adhesive (acid-etch only), b-with an etch-and-rinse adhesive (SingleBondTM), c-with a self-etch adhesive (AdperTMEasyBond), d-with acid-etch+self-etch adhesive (AdperTMEasyBond) by two previously calibrated dentists using a table of random numbers. Two other calibrated examiners, independently evaluated the sealants at baseline and at 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month recalls. Each sealant was evaluated in terms of caries formation being present or absent and retention using the following criteria: 1=completely retained, 2=partial loss, and 3=total loss. The Pearson χ2 test was used to evaluate differences in retention rates among the sealants for each evaluation period.
Conditions
- Fissure Sealant Loss
- Caries
Interventions
- OTHER
-
acid-etch
acid-etch
- OTHER
-
self-etch adhesive
Self etch (7th generation ) bonding agent
- OTHER
-
etch-and-rinse adhesive
Total etch bonding agent (5th generation)
- OTHER
-
self-etch adhesive after acid-etch
acid etch + self-etch adhesive Self etch (7th generation ) bonding agent
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hacettepe University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
A.Ruya Yazici, DDS, PhD · Hacettepe University School of Dentistry
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 23 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2010-10-31
- Primary Completion
- 2012-12-31
- Completion
- 2013-01-31
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparative Evaluation of Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Fissure Sealants on Newly Erupted Permanent First Molars: A 24-Month Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07115290 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Sealing of Initial Occlusal Caries Using Fissure Sealants
NCT05891288 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Glass Ionomer Sealant Versus Resin Sealant for Pits and Fissures of the First Permanent Molars
NCT05988801 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Efficacy of Different Fissure Sealant Materials in the Newly Erupted Non-Carious First Permanent Molars
NCT04854720 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Self Etch Giomer Based Fissure Sealant
NCT05336162 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Resin Based and Glass Ionomer Based Hydrophilic Fissure Sealants
NCT05127343 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Effectiveness of Embrace Wetbond and Clinpro as Pits and Fissure Sealants in Young Permanent Molars
NCT02933463 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of a Flowable Resin-based Sealant With Two Types of Adhesives
NCT04945382 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of Flowable Resin With Sprg and of a Flowable Resin in First Permanent Molars
NCT04701294 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
"Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Pit and Fissure Sealants on Permanent First Molar Teeth in Children."
NCT05791682 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Retention Rate of Self-etch Resin Based Sealant With and Without Prior Sandblasting
NCT04929327 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of Fluoride Varnish Versus Resin Based Sealant
NCT04603573 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Sealants vs Conventional Sealants in Permanent Molars
NCT03779893 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Comparing Bond Strength,Microleakage and Clinical Performance of Three Pit and Fissure Sealants
NCT04272866 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Retention for Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Uncooperative Children
NCT04560985 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Giomer and Resin-based Fissure Sealants
NCT04929782 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Study Aims to Compare the Effectiveness of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass-containing Adhesives vs Conventional Universal Adhesives on the Clinical Performance Composite Restorations Through Promoting Dentin Remineralization After Selective Caries Removal Over a Two-year Follow-up
NCT06990945 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Investigation of the Incidence of Caries in Pits and Fissures Sealed With Bioactive Sealant Compared to Fluoride Releasing Resin Based Pit and Fissure Sealant
NCT03628729 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of a Self-etch Adhesive Using a Selective Etch Technique
NCT01369134 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparative Evaluation of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Partially Erupted First Molars
NCT07052526 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison of Long-Term Effectiveness of Two Desensitizing Products
NCT03851900 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention of Bonded Amalgam Sealants Versus Resin-based Sealants
NCT03130725 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Compariing a Bioactive Resin Material Used As A Fissure Sealant To A Conventional Resin
NCT04052802 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Giomer Preceded by Etching Versus Resin-Based Sealants Applied on Permanent Molars Affected by Molar-Incisor Hypo-mineralization
NCT06922552 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
One Year Clinical Performance of Self Adhesive Giomer Containing Flowable Composite in Restoring Class V Cavities
NCT04944485 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA