Retention of Flowable Resin With Sprg and of a Flowable Resin in First Permanent Molars
NCT04701294 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2021-01-08
Summary
Objective: Determine which of the two sealants has better retention during the periods of 6, 9 and 12 months, one based on flowable resin with sprg or the other only based on flowable resin and we have the following hypothesis: the retention of the sealant based on a flowable resin with sprg is greater than a sealant based on a flowable resin in permanent first molars at different periods ".
Materials and methods: 60 children from the school in the district of Pichanaki, Peru and aged 6 to 8 years were included in this study. The Split mouth design will be adopted, and 120 permanent first molars are designated.It will be applied on the upper / lower first molars with sealant material being the order assigned according to the previous randomization, for the intervention group they will be sealed based on flowable resin with sprg (giomer F03 beautifil-Shofu) in association with a bottle of adhesive (single bond) and on the contralateral side the upper / lower first molars will be sealed, the control group will be sealed with a flowable resin-based resin compound (Tetric N-Flow ivoclar vivadent) in association with a bottle of adhesive (Single Bond). Placement of materials on the right / left side of the mouth will be randomly assigned following block randomization procedures with a 1:1 allocation using the random block sizes of 4 and 8 (35).A computerized random number generator will be used. A total of 120 upper / lower molar teeth will be sealed with both materials (60 teeth for each material). The materials will be placed by the same operator according to the protocol of UNMSM for the sealing of pits and deep fissures; then, the interventional group will be compared after a 12-month follow-up with controls at 6, 9 and 12 months. The statistical analysis will be with SPSS software 20.0. Since all the data in this study will be categorical, nonparametric statistics will be used. Expected result: After the evaluation period it is expected to find significant differences in the retention of the sealant to flowable resin base with sprg (giomer F03 beautifil -Shofu) and sealant based on flowable resin (Tetric N- Flow ivoclar vivadent) using an adhesive system . Conclusion: Identify and quantify the retention of a sealant based on flowable resin with sprg (giomer F03 Beautifil -Shofu) and a sealant based on flowable resin (Tetric N-Flow ivoclar vivadent) using an adhesive system on 12 months.
Conditions
- Pit and Fissure Sealant
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Giomer Beautifil flow plusF03 Shofu-Japan
A pair of permanent first molars will be used for each participant homologs The operator will apply in the upper / lower first molars the sealant material in the order assigned according to the previous randomization. For the intervention group, they will be sealed based on a fluid resin with s-prg glass ionomer filling (Giomer F03 Beautiful -Shofu) in association with a bottle of adhesive (Single Bond) . The evaluation and monitoring process; another operator will record the retention of the sealant in a period of 6, 9 and 12 months.
- DEVICE
-
Tetric N flow ivoclar vivadent-Germany
And on the contralateral side (control) the first upper / lower molars will be sealed will be sealed with a fluid resin compound (Tetric N-Flow ivoclar vivadent) in association with a bottle of adhesive (Single Bond). Both materials have a similar color. The operator and the child will not be informed about the brand of the material used. The assistant will collect the data in the file. The evaluation and monitoring process; another operator will record the retention of the sealant in a period of 6, 9 and 12 months.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Catherine Christie Ruiz Yasuda
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Catherine Ruiz Yasuda, Doctor · Faculty of dentistry UNMSM.
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 6 Years
- Max Age
- 8 Years
- Sex
- MALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-03-31
- Primary Completion
- 2022-04-30
- Completion
- 2022-08-31
Countries
- Peru
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Self Etch Giomer Based Fissure Sealant
NCT05336162 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Efficacy of Different Fissure Sealant Materials in the Newly Erupted Non-Carious First Permanent Molars
NCT04854720 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Treatment of Deep Carious Lesions With Selective Caries Removal, Partial or Full Pulpotomy
NCT04807244 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Sealing of Initial Occlusal Caries Using Fissure Sealants
NCT05891288 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Retention for Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Sealants in Uncooperative Children
NCT04560985 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Resin Infiltrate As Pit and Fissure Sealant in Permanent Molars
NCT06729788 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparative Evaluation of Glass Ionomer and Resin-Based Fissure Sealants on Newly Erupted Permanent First Molars: A 24-Month Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07115290 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Trial to Assess the Retention and Caries Preventive Effect of Resin Based Sealants Versus ART Sealants
NCT02408601 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Clinical Efficiency of Bioactive Pit and Fissure Sealant
NCT06493942 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical Evaluation Fissure Sealants Applied With Different Isolation Techniques
NCT07110701 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Clinical Trial of Fissure Sealants Comparing Universal Adhesive With Etch-And-Rinse Adhesive After 24 Month
NCT04837469 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Follow Up of a Fissure Sealant Placed With Different Adhesive Protocols: 2-Year Randomized Split Mouth Study
NCT02998814 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of an Adhesive System on the Retention and Caries Prevention for Fissure Sealants in Permanent Molars
NCT06608563 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Restorative Materials in Restoring Class II Cavities of Primary Molars
NCT06000085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Giomer Preceded by Etching Versus Resin-Based Sealants Applied on Permanent Molars Affected by Molar-Incisor Hypo-mineralization
NCT06922552 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Fuji Type VII Sealant Versus Resin Based Sealant. A Clinical Trial
NCT02795728 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Retention Rate of Self-etch Resin Based Sealant With and Without Prior Sandblasting
NCT04929327 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Cost-effectiveness of Fluoride Varnish Versus Resin Based Sealant (Part 2)
NCT04793256 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
TheraCal LC Coronal Pulpotomy and MTA Coronal Pulpotomy in Mature Permanent Molars
NCT05733468 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Fissure Sealant Retention Trial
NCT00873990 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Comparison Between Resin Based and Glass Ionomer Based Hydrophilic Fissure Sealants
NCT05127343 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Outcomes of Partial Pulpotomy Treatment in Cariously Exposed Teeth
NCT06802549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy Evaluation of Two Different Fluoride Applications
NCT06131294 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Evaluation of Indirect vs. Direct Pulp Capping in Deep Carious Mandibular Molars
NCT06433297 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Selective Removal Technique With or Without a Bioactive Material for Deep Caries Lesions
NCT04743219 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA