MedTrace Logo

Silicate β-TCP vs Extended Sticky Bone for Peri-Implant Jumping Gap in Guided Immediate Implants: RCT

NCT07700706 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 72

Last updated 2026-07-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This randomized clinical trial compares three peri-implant jumping gap management approaches following fully guided immediate implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone. Clinical and digital outcomes will be evaluated after immediate provisionalization and final restoration.

Conditions

  • Tooth Loss in the Esthetic Zone Requiring Immediate Implant Placement
  • Guided Immediate Implant Placement
  • Bone Grafting
  • Customized Healing Abutment
  • Provisional Crown

Interventions

PROCEDURE

No Grafting

The peri-implant jumping gap was managed without grafting.

PROCEDURE

Silicate-Added β-TCP Putty

The peri-implant jumping gap was managed using silicate-added β-TCP putty.

PROCEDURE

Extended Sticky Bone

The peri-implant jumping gap was managed using extended sticky bone.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
50 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-12-01
Primary Completion
2026-06-30
Completion
2026-07-31

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07700706 on ClinicalTrials.gov