Access Sheaths With Aspiration for Renal RetrOgrade Surgery, Randomized CompArative Outcomes
NCT07678255 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 156
Last updated 2026-07-01
Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the ClearPetra ureteral access sheath (Coloplast) is more effective than the Navigator ureteral access sheath (Boston Scientific) in treating intrarenal kidney stones of 1-3 cm in adult patients undergoing flexible ureteroscopy (RIRS). The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does ClearPetra achieve a higher stone-free rate at 1 month post-intervention compared to Navigator, as assessed by non-contrast abdominal-pelvic CT scan?
Does ClearPetra reduce total surgical time compared to Navigator?
Does ClearPetra lower the retreatment rate at 3 months compared to Navigator?
Does ClearPetra present a rate of clinically significant complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ II) that is lower than or similar to Navigator?
Researchers will compare flexible ureteroscopy using the ClearPetra vacuum-assisted flexible ureteral access sheath to flexible ureteroscopy using the Navigator standard rigid ureteral access sheath, to see if ClearPetra leads to higher stone clearance rates while maintaining a comparable safety profile.
Participants will:
Undergo flexible ureteroscopy (RIRS) using one of two randomly assigned ureteral access sheaths (ClearPetra or Navigator), determined by computer-generated randomization immediately before surgery
Have a non-contrast abdominal-pelvic CT scan at 1 month post-intervention to assess stone-free status
Have a non-contrast abdominal-pelvic CT scan at 3 months post-intervention to evaluate residual fragments and the need for retreatment
Attend follow-up visits at 1 month and 3 months post-surgery for clinical assessment and complication recording
The study will be conducted at the Urology Department of Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (Seville, Spain), a tertiary reference centre. A total of 156 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio (78 per group), with pre-defined subgroup analyses stratified by stone size (1-2 cm vs. \>2 cm). The outcome assessor evaluating CT images for stone-free rate will be blinded to treatment allocation (single-blind).
Conditions
- Urolithiasis
- Nephrolithiasis
- Kidney Calculi
- Ureteroscopy
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
ClearPetra ureteral access sheath
Tip-flexible ureteral access sheath with integrated continuous vacuum aspiration system (Coloplast). Placed transurethrally prior to flexible ureteroscopy to maintain stable ureteral access and actively evacuate stone fragments and irrigation fluid throughout the RIRS procedure. Used in combination with laser lithotripsy (Holmium:YAG or Thulium) for fragmentation of intrarenal stones of 1-3 cm. Accessory instruments (retrieval basket, stone cone) employed per standardised intraoperative protocol.
- DEVICE
-
Navigator ureteral access sheath
Standard rigid ureteral access sheath without active aspiration mechanism (Boston Scientific). Placed transurethrally prior to flexible ureteroscopy to maintain stable ureteral access during the RIRS procedure. Used in combination with laser lithotripsy (Holmium:YAG or Thulium) for fragmentation of intrarenal stones of 1-3 cm. Accessory instruments (retrieval basket, stone cone) employed per standardised intraoperative protocol.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Paula Rodríguez-Marcos, MD · Department of Urology. Unit of Urolithiasis. Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain
-
Rafael A Medina-López, PhD · Department of Urology. Unit of Uro-Oncology. Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-09-15
- Primary Completion
- 2029-09-30
- Completion
- 2030-05-31
Countries
- Spain
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Trial of Efficacy of the RetroPerc Device
NCT05022537 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Sheathless, Traditional, and Suction Access Sheath RIRS for Renal Stones ≤2 cm
NCT07289230 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trial of Ureteroscopy vs Steerable Continuous Flow Aspiration Technology
NCT07101809 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Which Patinets Benefit More From Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy? A Location-Based Comparative Analysis of PCNL and RIRS for 1-2 cm Renal Stones
NCT07589153 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Tip-flexible Semi-rigid Ureterorenoscope Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy in Renal Calculi
NCT02426931 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Standard Versus Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath in Pediatric Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Renal Stones < 2 cm
NCT07689565 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Management of Medium Sized Renal Stones
NCT06720311 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS Versus ESWL for the Treatment of Renal Stones
NCT02645058 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Comparison Between Ureteral Stent and Nephrostomy Tube for an Urgent Drainage of Obstructed Kidney
NCT00739284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Use of a Ureteral Access Sheath During Ureteroscopy and Its Effect on Stone Free Rate
NCT00199524 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between MPCNL and RIRS
NCT02067221 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
RIRS With Flex Suction Sheath vs. PCNL for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07058402 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
HoYAG vs TFL in miniPCNL With ClearPetra
NCT07087977 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Flexible & Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath vs. Antegrade Suction in Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy for Lower Calyceal Stones
NCT06889051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy And Safety Of Antegrade Uretroscopic Lithotripsy Versus Retrograde Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy In The Treatment Of Upper Ureteric Stones Measuring > 10 mm In Maximum Dimension. A Randomized Comparative Study
NCT07362784 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of BackStop in Patients Undergoing Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy
NCT02122341 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Semi-rigid Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Stones: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06489366 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) With High-Power Laser and Flexible, Navigable Suction Access Sheath (FANS) vs Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (miniPCNL) for 2-3 cm Renal Stones
NCT07349992 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
ESWL Vs Flexible Uretroscopy in Management of Upper Ureteric Stones a Prospective Randomized Study
NCT06722703 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
PMCF Investigation of MODULITH® SLX-F2 With StorM-Track in Patients With Kidney Stones
NCT07272720 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Flexible urétéroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal Calculi
NCT01604304 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Ureteral Stenting After Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones
NCT05738304 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Kidney Stone Calculator
NCT05707988 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparing Treatment of Urolithiasis Between Disposable and Reusable Ureteroscope
NCT03040466 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between Ureterorenoscopy With Lithotripsy Alone Versus Combination With Hydrogel for Kidney Stone Removal
NCT06469736 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA