MedTrace Logo

Comparison of the Efficacy of Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy in Periodontitis Patients

NCT07671274 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: EARLY_PHASE1 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 30

Last updated 2026-06-26

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

the aim of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes of Minimally Invasive Non-Surgical Therapy(MINST) compared to Conventional non-surgical periodontal therapy (CNST)

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

Mechanical debridement .

On the conventional non-surgical periodontal therapy side, a power-driven piezo•electric ultrasonic scaling device with scaling tips will be used the majority of the time to debride subgingival biofilm and calculus. and manual standard gracey curette instruments will be used to refine residuals from root surfaces.

DEVICE

minimally invasive mechanical debridement

Briefly. the root surface of teeth will be thoroughly debrided by a minimally invasive approach using specific thin and delicate piezo-electric scaling tips (Woodpecker � Tip P3. Am Perfect sp. z o .• � Poland) and manual miniature periodontal curettes {� Dent Solutions. Cairo. Egypt) for reducing periodontal tissue trauma. Adjunctive use of magnification loupes will be performed.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Mansoura University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
40 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-08-05
Primary Completion
2026-08-05
Completion
2026-08-05

Countries

  • Egypt

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Diseases

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07671274 on ClinicalTrials.gov