MedTrace Logo

Manual Versus Oscillating-rotating Toothbrushes After Root Coverage Procedure

NCT02534220 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2015-08-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the gingival margin stability with the use of oscillating-rotating toothbrushes compared to manual toothbrushes.

Conditions

  • Gingival Recession

Interventions

DEVICE

Manual Toothbrush

Gum Delicate Post-Surgical Toothbrush, Oral-B, Procter \& Gamble, Cincinnati, OH

DEVICE

Oscillating-rotating toothbrush

Triumph 5000, Oral-B, Procter \& Gamble, Cincinnati, OH

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Milan

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Giulio Rasperini · Unit of Periodontology, Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Policlinic

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-02-28
Primary Completion
2014-11-30
Completion
2014-11-30

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT02534220 on ClinicalTrials.gov