Comparison of Patient-Reported Comfort Between Two Clear Aligner Trimming-Line Designs: A Split-Mouth Study
NCT07660809 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 70
Last updated 2026-08-21
Summary
* The trimming-line design of clear aligners (supragingival versus juxtagingival) is a routine clinical decision whose influence on patient-reported comfort has not been established; available evidence on aligner comfort derives almost exclusively from comparisons with fixed appliances.
* This observational, cross-sectional study compares two clear aligner trimming-line designs with respect to patient-reported comfort: a supragingival design, whose edge rests on the marginal gingiva, and a juxtagingival design, whose edge follows the gingival contour without covering it. Because the two designs sit differently against the gingival soft tissue, they may be experienced differently during wear.
* Participants are patients already wearing one trimming-line design on one dental arch and the other on the contralateral arch; each participant thus serves as their own control. After a minimum of four weeks of wear, participants complete a 20-item questionnaire once, rating the frequency of defined oral experiences for the maxillary and mandibular arch separately on a three-point ordinal scale (0 = none, 1 = occasional, 2 = frequent).
* The questionnaire is anonymous; the design worn on each arch is identified from which of two identical forms a participant completes. Responses for the two designs are compared within each participant. The study evaluates whether trimming-line design is associated with differences in patient-reported comfort.
Conditions
- Patient Comfort
- Malocclusion
- Oral Health
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
Supragingival trimming-line design
Clear aligner edge covering approximately 2 mm of marginal gingiva (straight cut), worn on one dental arch.
- DEVICE
-
Juxtagingival festooned trimming-line design
Clear aligner edge following the scalloped gingival contour, terminating at the free gingival margin without covering the gingiva, worn on the contralateral arch.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Targu Mures
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
EMILIA (PRODEA) RUSU · George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology of Targu Mures, 38 Gheorghe Marinescu Street, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania
-
LUMINITA LAZAR, DDS, PhD · George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology of Targu Mures, 38 Gheorghe Marinescu Street, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 15 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-07-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-08-07
- Completion
- 2026-08-07
Countries
- Romania
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison of Subjective Experiences Between Patients Receiving Clear Aligners or Fixed Appliances
NCT03656471 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of the Perceived Experience of Patients Treated With Aligners With Two Different Timings
NCT06536335 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Prospective Multicenter Clinical Investigation Evaluating the Accuracy of the Trimline Design When Treated With SureSmile® Aligners.
NCT07290790 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Side Effects of Different Treatment Methods
NCT06709287 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Oral Health Related Quality of Life Changes Between Clear Aligners and Vestibular Fixed Appliances
NCT04866238 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Predictability of Orthodontic Tooth Movement With Invisalign Aligners
NCT05356780 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Effect of Clear Aligner Wear Protocol on External Root Resorption
NCT07522216 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Changes in Pulpal Blood Flow Between Conventional and Self-ligating Fixed Orthodontic Brackets During Leveling and Alignment Stage
NCT03780764 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
IOA Preventing Occlusal Changes With MAD Use
NCT07103941 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction With At-home Dental Bleaching Using Orthodontic Retainers With Different Margin Designs
NCT07208708 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Use of Clear Aligners With Movement Enhancement Techniques
NCT02087163 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Clear Aligner Trays to Straighten Teeth
NCT03141788 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Customized Attachment Composites in Clear Aligner Therapy
NCT07261735 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Single-Layer and Triple-Layer TPU MaxFlex Aligners After Intraoral Use
NCT07566533 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Removable Appliances and Clear Aligners in Early Orthodontic Treatments During the Mixed Dentition Period
NCT07331090 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Conventional vs Digital CAD/CAM Splints for Bruxism
NCT06518447 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Upper Sequential Distalization With TADs and Aligners
NCT04875104 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
3D Printed vs. Milled Occlusal Splints in Dentistry
NCT07236294 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Orthognathic Surgery With Clear Aligners vs Conventional Brackets
NCT07511296 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Pain and Activity Levels After Orthodontic Separators
NCT05615688 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Optimizing Orthodontic Appliances Efficiency With Remote Dental Monitoring and Artificial Intelligence Algorithms
NCT05573308 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Difference Between Pressing and Vacuum Techniques in Fabrication of Orthodontic Aligners in Cases With Spacing: A Cross-sectional Study
NCT06231875 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
A Study to Compare Nighttime Aligners to Daytime Aligners
NCT06539676 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Tooth Discoloration and Chairside Handling Time (Bonding-Debonding) in Flowable Versus Packable Composites for Clear Aligner Bonded Attachments: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07234149 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Outcome of Safe T Separators and Conventional Elastomeric Separators
NCT07119814 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA