Comparison of Patient-Reported Comfort Between Two Clear Aligner Trimming-Line Designs: A Split-Mouth Study

NCT07660809 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 70

Last updated 2026-08-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

* The trimming-line design of clear aligners (supragingival versus juxtagingival) is a routine clinical decision whose influence on patient-reported comfort has not been established; available evidence on aligner comfort derives almost exclusively from comparisons with fixed appliances.
* This observational, cross-sectional study compares two clear aligner trimming-line designs with respect to patient-reported comfort: a supragingival design, whose edge rests on the marginal gingiva, and a juxtagingival design, whose edge follows the gingival contour without covering it. Because the two designs sit differently against the gingival soft tissue, they may be experienced differently during wear.
* Participants are patients already wearing one trimming-line design on one dental arch and the other on the contralateral arch; each participant thus serves as their own control. After a minimum of four weeks of wear, participants complete a 20-item questionnaire once, rating the frequency of defined oral experiences for the maxillary and mandibular arch separately on a three-point ordinal scale (0 = none, 1 = occasional, 2 = frequent).
* The questionnaire is anonymous; the design worn on each arch is identified from which of two identical forms a participant completes. Responses for the two designs are compared within each participant. The study evaluates whether trimming-line design is associated with differences in patient-reported comfort.

Conditions

  • Patient Comfort
  • Malocclusion
  • Oral Health

Interventions

DEVICE

Supragingival trimming-line design

Clear aligner edge covering approximately 2 mm of marginal gingiva (straight cut), worn on one dental arch.

DEVICE

Juxtagingival festooned trimming-line design

Clear aligner edge following the scalloped gingival contour, terminating at the free gingival margin without covering the gingiva, worn on the contralateral arch.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Targu Mures

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • EMILIA (PRODEA) RUSU · George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology of Targu Mures, 38 Gheorghe Marinescu Street, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania

  • LUMINITA LAZAR, DDS, PhD · George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences, and Technology of Targu Mures, 38 Gheorghe Marinescu Street, 540139 Targu Mures, Romania

Eligibility

Min Age
15 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2026-07-01
Primary Completion
2026-08-07
Completion
2026-08-07

Countries

  • Romania

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07660809 on ClinicalTrials.gov