Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
NCT07626996 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60
Last updated 2026-06-04
Summary
The study aims to compare laparoscopic-assisted radical hysterectomy with open radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer. A total of 60 patients diagnosed with FIGO stage IA1, IA2, and IB1 cervical cancer were enrolled and randomly assigned into two equal groups: laparoscopic surgery and open surgery. All patients underwent total hysterectomy, bilateral adnexectomy, and pelvic lymph node dissection.
Perioperative outcomes were evaluated, including operative time, blood loss, complications, and hospital stay, as well as long-term oncological outcomes such as recurrence, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival. Patients were followed for up to three years postoperatively. The findings of this study aim to assess the safety, feasibility, and clinical effectiveness of laparoscopic-assisted surgery compared with the conventional open approach in the management of early-stage cervical cancer.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy
In this procedure, a minimally invasive laparoscopic-assisted radical hysterectomy is performed, including dissection of the pelvic lymph nodes and closure of the vaginal stump with an endoscopic stapler.
- PROCEDURE
-
Open Radical Hysterectomy
A standard open abdominal radical hysterectomy includes dissection of the pelvic lymph nodes and the closure of the vaginal stump.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Zagazig University
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Ola A Harb, Professor · Zagazig University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 38 Years
- Max Age
- 65 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-03-01
- Primary Completion
- 2024-01-31
- Completion
- 2024-01-31
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Study of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Based on Space Anatomy in Patients With IB3 and IIA2 Cervical Cancer
NCT06759480 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer
NCT00614211 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Therapy Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Management of Early Stage Cervical Cancer
NCT04999696 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy Using Endoscopic Stapler in Stage IB2 or IIA1 Cervical Cancer
NCT07256977 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radical Versus Simple Hysterectomy and Pelvic Node Dissection With Low-risk Early Stage Cervical Cancer
NCT01658930 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Role of Laparoscopy in Assessing Resectability of Ovarian Cancer
NCT05564234 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer(Stage IA1 With LVSI, IA2)
NCT04934982 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility and Functional Outcome of Laparoscopic Nerve Sparing Radical Hysterectomy
NCT02524756 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Simple Versus Radical Hysterectomy for Stage I Cervical Cancer
NCT00506376 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer(Stage IB3,IIA2)
NCT04939831 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Complete Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer
NCT02562729 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Radical Hysterectomy: Evolution Of Surgical Approach and Related Outcomes
NCT03577613 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Class II and Class III Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer Cervical Cancer
NCT02368574 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
LESs Surgical Radicality for EaRly Stage Cervical Cancer
NCT02613286 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Study Assessing Emotional, Sexual and Quality of Life Concerns Of Women Undergoing Removal of the Cervix Versus Removal of the Uterus,Ovaries and Fallopian Tubes For Treatment Of Early Stage Cervical Cancer
NCT00579787 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Minimally Invasive Simple Hysterectomy in Low Risk Cervical Cancer
NCT06416748 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Five-year Survival and Disease-free Survival in Patients Diagnosed With Endometrium Cancer Who Underwent Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With and Without Uterine Manipulator
NCT06307886 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Different Surgical Approaches in Patients of Early-stage Cervical Cancer
NCT03739944 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Prognostic Value of Conization and Negative HPV After Conization in AIS and Early Stage Cervical Cancer
NCT06196190 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
German-funded Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer
NCT06489795 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
2D Versus 3D Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: a Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT02320578 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Learning Curves for Two Different Techniques in Vaginal Hysterectomy
NCT06220253 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Association Between Surgical Timing and Route of Total Hysterectomy After LEEP and Perioperative Risk in Patients With Cervical HSIL
NCT06325592 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Effect of Vertical Versus Horizontal Vaginal Cuff Closure on Vaginal Length After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT02276261 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility of the Management of Severe Cervical Dysplasia in a Single Visit
NCT00237562 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3