MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Learning Curves for Two Different Techniques in Vaginal Hysterectomy

NCT06220253 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2024-05-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Randomized prospective monocentric interventional study to compare learning curves for traditional vaginal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy performed by bipolar coagulation comparing short-term outcomes for both procedures.

Conditions

  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse
  • Gynecologic Disorders
  • Surgery

Interventions

PROCEDURE

vaginal hysterectomy by bipolar vessels sealing

The surgery will take place according to the canonical times of vaginal hysterectomy and all the support structures will be coagulated and cut by a bipolar vessel sealing instrument

PROCEDURE

vaginal hysterectomy by traditional technique

The surgery will take place according to the canonical times of vaginal hysterectomy and all the support structures will be sutured by absorbable threads

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • IRCCS San Raffaele

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Stefano Salvatore, MD · San Raffaele Hospital, Milan

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-06-30
Primary Completion
2025-03-31
Completion
2025-03-31

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06220253 on ClinicalTrials.gov