Laparotomy vs Laparoscopy in Endometrial Cancer Staging
NCT07546825 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 48
Last updated 2026-06-10
Summary
Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynecological malignancies worldwide. Surgical staging is the cornerstone of management and traditionally performed via laparotomy. However, minimally invasive surgery, particularly laparoscopy, has emerged as an effective alternative with potential benefits in reducing postoperative morbidity.
This study aims to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open (laparotomy) surgical staging in patients with endometrial cancer in low-resource settings. Primary aim: To compare early postoperative recovery after surgical staging for early-stage endometrial cancer between laparoscopic and open approaches, assessed primarily by time to ambulation.
• Secondary aim: To compare intraoperative outcomes (operative time, blood loss, lymph node yield), postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo classification), quality of recovery (QoR-15), length of hospital stay, same day discharge(SDD), discrepancy between preoperative curettage pathology and final histopathology, delay in initiation of adjuvant therapy, one-year disease-free survival, direct hospital costs between both approaches, and quality of life using EQ-5D-5L questionnaire.
Given the limited resources and variations in surgical expertise in low-resource settings, this study seeks to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of laparoscopy compared to laparotomy. The findings may help guide clinical decision-making and optimize surgical approaches in similar healthcare environments.
Conditions
- Gynaecological Oncology
- Gynaecological Malignancies
- Laparoscopic
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
laparoscopic surgical staging
surgical staging by laparoscopy
- PROCEDURE
-
open surgical staging
surgical staging through open surgery
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Assiut University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-06-02
- Primary Completion
- 2028-04-01
- Completion
- 2028-10-01
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparison Between High and Low Level Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy in High and Intermediate Risk Endometrial Carcinoma
NCT07306195 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Different Risk Stratification Models for Prediction of Lymph Node Involvement in Endometrial Carcinoma
NCT04120649 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Endometrial Carcinoma: Comparison of Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopy vs Laparotomy)
NCT06790004 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Minilap Hysterectomy
NCT03251677 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Upper Vaginectomy Versus Brachytherapy in Patients With Early Stage Endometrial Cancer Treated With Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT00719017 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Endometrial Cancer and Robotic-assisted Versus Traditional Laparoscopy
NCT01466777 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Study of Post Operative Pain in Endometrial Cancer Robotic Versus Laparotomy
NCT00909896 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Cost-Effectiveness and Patients Satisfaction of Conventional vs Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncologic Indications
NCT02865889 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Complications of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Endometrial Carcinoma
NCT04894552 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Single-port Access Laparoscopic-assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy
NCT01048931 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of Transvaginal Paracervical and Transperitoneal Approaches in Lymphadenectomy During v-NOTES Surgery for Patients Diagnosed With Endometrial Cancer
NCT06870903 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Five-year Survival and Disease-free Survival in Patients Diagnosed With Endometrium Cancer Who Underwent Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With and Without Uterine Manipulator
NCT06307886 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparing Robotics and Laparoscopy With Laparotomy/Open Surgery for Endometrial Cancer
NCT01480999 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic vs Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy In Patients With Early Cervical Cancer
NCT01258413 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of the Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Total Abdominal Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecologic Conditions in a Limited-resources Setting.
NCT07496814 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer
NCT00614211 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Obese Patients With Early Endometrial Cancer
NCT05974995 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Approach to Cancer of the Endometrium
NCT00096408 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Laparoscopic Versus Transvaginal Closure of the Vaginal Vault After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT06867614 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Feasibility and Functional Outcome of Laparoscopic Nerve Sparing Radical Hysterectomy
NCT02524756 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hystrolaparoscopic Findings in Infertile Women with Previous Uterine Surgery
NCT06759220 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Impact of Opportunistic Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
NCT01893086 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Medico-economic Evaluation of Robot-assisted Laparoscopy Compared With Conventional Laparoscopy in Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
NCT06348719 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of LAVH and Minilaparotomy Hysterectomy
NCT03548831 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Presumably Early Stage Cervical Cancer: a Retrospective Multicenter Non-inferiority Study Comparing Overall and Progression-free Survival.
NCT07120529 ·Status: RECRUITING