Mechanical Power for Ventilatory Settings in Operating Room
NCT07620132 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 490
Last updated 2026-06-02
Summary
Postoperative respiratory failure (PRF) is a dreaded complication that imposes a significant burden through unplanned admission to the ICU, post discharge disability and mortality. Despite widespread implementation of intraoperative lung-protective ventilation strategies over the past decade, results remain inconsistent. Interventions targeting individual parameters like tidal volume or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) have shown equivocal results. The use of high PEEP and recruitment maneuvers raises safety concerns by possible negative hemodynamic effects. Recent studies suggest that individualizing ventilation strategies based on mechanical power-a composite parameter integrating tidal volume, plateau pressure, PEEP, and ventilator frequency-may better predict and help prevent PRF, independently of patients' baseline respiratory system compliance. These studies identified this parameter as interventional targets to reduce lung injury during mechanical ventilation. However, no multicenter randomized controlled trial has been performed in the field of ventilatory settings titration during invasive mechanical ventilation in operating room.
The investigators hypothesize that a ventilation strategy aimed at decreasing mechanical power will reduce the incidence of PRF and mortality in patients undergoing abdominal surgery, compared with a standard strategy using fixed tidal volume and PEEP
Conditions
- Postoperative Respiratory Failure
- Abdominal Surgery
- Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
- Morality
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Mechanical power-guided ventilatory strategy
1. Tidal volume 7ml/kg PBW and RR titrated for EtCO2 between 40-50mmHg. See calculated Mechanical power:0,049\*tidal volume\*RR\*driving pressure. 2. Set PEEP 15cmH2O and perform recruitment maneuver at 30cmH2O for 20s. Decrease PEEP from 15 by steps of 2cmH2O until the lower level of PEEP minimizing mechanical power. Note mechanical power. Stop maneuver and/or decrease level of PEEP if decrease\>20% of cardiac output during the maneuver, when compared to baseline. 3. Repeat this step using 9 ml/kg PBW and choose the optimal tidal volume with lowest mechanical power. During the surgery, adjust RR to maintain EtCO2 between 40-50mmHg, with an inspiratory-to-expiratory time ratio of 1:2 to 1:1, an end-inspiratory pause of 30%, an FiO2 adjusted to maintain SpO2≥94%. Recruitment maneuvers will be performed after intubation, in case of ventilator disconnection, coelioscopy insufflation, change of position, at the end of surgery, or if mechanical power \>30%.
- PROCEDURE
-
Standard fixed ventilatory settings
Tidal volume 7 ml/kg predicted body weight, calculated according to a predefined formula: 50+0.91 x (centimeters of height - 152.4) for males and 45.5+0.91 x (centimeters of height - 152.4) for females, fixed PEEP between 6 and 8 cmH20, recruitment maneuvers at the discretion of the physician. The respiratory rate will be adjusted to maintain end-tidal partial pressure of CO2 between 30 and 40 mmHg, a target reported to be used by approximately 90% of physicians according to a recent online survey administered to French anesthesiologists via the French Society of Anesthesia \& Intensive Care Medecine (SFAR), which will be published soon, with an inspiratory-to-expiratory time ratio of 1:2 to 1:1, an end-inspiratory pause of 30 %, and an FiO2 adjusted to maintain SpO2 ≥ 94%. Mechanical power will not be measured during the surgery to avoid any modification of the ventilatory setting by the physician in charge.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University Hospital, Montpellier
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Audrey DEBRUS, Dr · University Hospital, Montpellier
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2029-01-01
- Completion
- 2029-01-01
More Related Trials
-
Pressure Controlled Ventilation Versus Volume Controlled Ventilation in Upper Abdominal Surgery
NCT05690867 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Transpulmonary Pressure Guided Ventilation on Intraoperative Right Heart Function
NCT05709041 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Different Inspired Oxygen Concentrations on Intraoperative Recruitment Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery
NCT06746181 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Outcome and Predictors of Mortality of Patients on Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation
NCT06087939 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Intraoperative Protective Ventilation and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
NCT02671721 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Protective Mechanical Ventilation and Risk of Postoperative Complications in Abdominal Surgery
NCT03165760 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Intraoperative Protective Mechanical Ventilation in Patients Requiring Emergency Abdominal Surgery
NCT03987789 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Individualized Perioperative Open Lung Ventilatory Strategy
NCT02158923 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Individualized Perioperative Open-Lung Ventilatory Strategy During One-Lung Ventilation
NCT03182062 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Flow-Controlled Ventilation to Improve Postoperative Pulmonary Outcome After Thoracic Surgery
NCT07623395 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Lung-protective Mechanical Ventilation for Abdominal Laparoscopic Surgeries
NCT04546932 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Two Strategies of One-lung Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Carcinological Lung Resection Surgery.
NCT05525312 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mechanical Power in One-lung Ventilation
NCT07353788 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Effect of Intraoperative PEEP Individualization According to Driving Pressure in Major Abdominal Surgery
NCT05781373 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Pressure-controlled Ventilation on the Respiratory Complication in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colectomy Compared With Volume-controlled Ventilation
NCT02039466 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
PROtective Ventilation With FLOW-Controlled Ventilation
NCT06703814 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Transpulmonary Pressure Under Stressing Conditions
NCT03746236 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Two Modes of Mechanical Ventilation for Intensive Care Patients With Low Blood Oxygen Due to Breathing Difficulties
NCT06140056 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Peak Airway Pressure and Respiratory Mechanics During PRVC Ventilation in Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT07543939 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Hemodynamic Effects of Two Modalities of Alveolar Recruitment Maneuvers in Major Abdominal Surgery Patients
NCT05365113 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Flow Controlled Ventilation in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT06256900 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Power Dissipation in Flow-controlled Ventilation
NCT06222463 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Protective Versus Conventional Mechanical Ventilation for Peripheral Vascular Surgery.
NCT03616210 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Perioperative Prophylactic Positive Pressure Ventilation Reduces Postoperative Pulmonary Complications.
NCT07461285 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Positive End-expiratory Pressure and Alveolar Recruitment for One Lung Ventilation
NCT01652612 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA