A Two-year Study Evaluating the Surface-sealed Cervical Resin Composite Restorations in Comparison With the Non-sealed Restorations
NCT07618013 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 25
Last updated 2026-06-05
Summary
After finishing and polishing are completed, the tooth surface may exhibit microcracks and micro-irregularities that create a roughened surface, which may lead to plaque retention, gingival inflammation, and discoloration. The surface-penetrating sealant was introduced to fill micro-irregularities by capillary action, providing a uniform, regular surface and enhancing the surface smoothness. The application of unfilled low-viscosity surface sealants aims to enhance the luster, smoothness, and color stability of esthetic restorations and decrease stain absorption. They have low viscosity that enables them to easily spread and penetrate over these finished and polished surfaces, which may affect the life of the restoration positively. Additionally, it decreases surface porosity and creates a surface that is more thoroughly cured, improving the composite's stain resistance.
This prospective, parallel-group, randomized clinical study aims to compare the clinical effectiveness of using surface sealants on cervical resin composite restorations versus non-sealed restorations. Restorations will be assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months using modified USPHS criteria. The primary outcome will be assessing marginal discoloration, and the secondary outcomes will be assessing color match, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, surface texture, and marginal adaptation. Color stability will be assessed by VITA Easyshade®.
Conditions
- Marginal Discoloration
- Color Stability
Interventions
- OTHER
-
PermaSeal™, Ultradent Products Inc., USA
Unfilled resin surface sealant
- OTHER
-
OPTIGLAZE™, GC, Tokyo, Japan
Unfilled resin surface sealant
- OTHER
-
Conventional finishing and polishing protocol
Restorations without resin surface sealants.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 55 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-07-31
- Primary Completion
- 2028-07-31
- Completion
- 2028-08-31
More Related Trials
-
Influences of Gingival Cord Retractor in Retention Rate of Non-carious Cervical Lesions Restorations.
NCT02961049 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two HEMA-Free Universal Adhesive Systems
NCT07731061 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Partial Pulpotomy Procedure in Primary Molars Utilizing Different Capping Materials and Different Restorative Methods
NCT06227390 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
18-Month Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer Compared to Conventional Flowable Giomer in Carious Cervical Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06946134 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cervical Carious Lesions Restored With Calcium Silicate Based Cement (Biodentine) Compared With Glass-ionomer Cement
NCT03418246 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Versus Self-Adhesive Resin Composite Restorative Systems
NCT06543680 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Restoration of Non-carious Cervical Lesions With Different Resin Composites and Universal Adhesive
NCT06393699 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bioactive Giomer Material Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Deep Marginal Elevation
NCT06497231 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
3D Printed Ceramic-Filled Photopolymer Resin Vs. CAD/CAM Resin Composite Overlays for Restoration of Extensively Damaged Endodontically Treated Posterior Teeth. An 18-month Follow-up
NCT07378982 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Restorative vs GIC Modified Glass Ionomer in Restoration of Cervical Lesions: Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04363996 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites
NCT06137989 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
One Year Clinical Evaluation of Conservative Versus Conventional Ceramic Onlays
NCT05250232 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance Of Conserved Chalky White Demineralized Enamel Cavity Margins Versus Totally Removed Carious Margins In Class V Cavities Restored With Composite Resin
NCT05614076 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer With and Without Selective Enamel Etching
NCT07575646 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Indirect Pulp Capping Using Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate in Deep Carious Molars: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06889363 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Clinical Performance of ARS Containing Universal Adhesives in Carious Cervical Lesions
NCT06572124 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
NCT03859284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of High Viscosity Bioactive Injectable Composite in Deep Marginal Elevation
NCT06875544 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Performance of Bioactive Low Viscosity Composite in Deep Marginal Elevation Restorations
NCT06882343 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Release of Organic Components of a GIOMER in Non-carious Cervical Lesion Restorations
NCT03637946 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Reminerlization Potential of Innovative Biomimetic Material in Caries White Spot Lesions
NCT03823612 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bioactive Restorative Materials for Cervical Carious in High Caries Risk Patients
NCT06736964 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Clinical Performance of High Strength Hybrid Ceramic Indirect Restorations Cemented on Endodontically Treated Teeth Using Bioactive Versus Conventional Self Adhesive Resin Cements.
NCT06787469 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bioceramic vs High Viscosity GIC for Cervical Restorations of Geriatric Patients
NCT05624008 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA