Clinical Performance of Two HEMA-Free Universal Adhesive Systems
NCT07731061 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2026-07-30
Summary
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the 12-month clinical performance of two HEMA-free universal adhesive systems for restoring anterior cervical carious lesions. Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) to receive restorations using either a two-bottle HEMA-free universal adhesive (G2-Bond Universal) or a one-bottle HEMA-free universal adhesive (BeautiBond Xtreme), both applied in self-etch mode. The primary outcome is restoration retention, while secondary outcomes include marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, and postoperative sensitivity, evaluated at baseline (24 hours), 6 months, and 12 months using the modified USPHS criteria.
Conditions
- Cervical Caries
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
G2-Bond Universal
Two-bottle HEMA-free universal adhesive system used in self-etch mode for restoring anterior cervical carious lesions according to the manufacturer's instructions.
- DEVICE
-
BeautiBond Xtreme Universal Adhesive
One-bottle HEMA-free universal adhesive system (Shofu Inc.) used in self-etch mode for restoring anterior cervical carious lesions according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Cairo University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 55 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-11-30
- Primary Completion
- 2027-12-31
- Completion
- 2028-01-31
More Related Trials
-
Evaluation Of the BEAUTIBOND XTREME Adhesive in Class I and II Restorations: One-Year Results.
NCT06899386 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Hybrid Ceramic Occlusal Veneers Bonded With Two Self Adhesive Resin Cements
NCT07017062 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Study Aims to Compare the Effectiveness of Mesoporous Bioactive Glass-containing Adhesives vs Conventional Universal Adhesives on the Clinical Performance Composite Restorations Through Promoting Dentin Remineralization After Selective Caries Removal Over a Two-year Follow-up
NCT06990945 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
NCT03859284 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Adhesive Systems Containing HEMA and 10-MDP in Non Carious Cervical Lesions
NCT04756349 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer With and Without Selective Enamel Etching
NCT07575646 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Bioactive Giomer Material Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Deep Marginal Elevation
NCT06497231 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
18-Month Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Flowable Giomer Compared to Conventional Flowable Giomer in Carious Cervical Lesions: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06946134 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Bioceramic vs High Viscosity GIC for Cervical Restorations of Geriatric Patients
NCT05624008 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Versus Self-Adhesive Resin Composite Restorative Systems
NCT06543680 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Giomer Based Injectable Resin Composite Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Class V Carious Cavities Over 18-months.
NCT05389163 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Restoration of Non-carious Cervical Lesions With Different Resin Composites and Universal Adhesive
NCT06393699 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluating Universal Adhesives in Cervical Lesions
NCT07459374 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Low Technique Sensitive Self Cured Universal Adhesive Vrs Light Cured Universal Adhesive in Patients With (NCCLs): 18 m RCT
NCT04572386 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Different Bioactive Restorative Materials for Cervical Carious in High Caries Risk Patients
NCT06736964 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Hybrid Ceramic Laminate Veneers
NCT07027709 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Self-Cure vs. Highly Filled Flowable Composite in Carious Cervical Lesions: 18-Month RCT
NCT07576673 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Glass Ionomer With Advanced Glass Hybrid Technology Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Adult Patients With Carious Cervical Lesions After One Year
NCT05617703 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Glass Hybrid Versus Composite Restorations of Non-carious Cervical Lesions
NCT02631161 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Three Different Universal Adhesives in Non-carious Cervical Lesions
NCT03415412 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation Of Clinical Performance of Self-adhering Flowable Composite vs Conventional Flowable Composite in Cervical Carious Lesions
NCT04475172 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of BIS-GMA Free Dental Resin Composite
NCT05480852 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Restorative vs GIC Modified Glass Ionomer in Restoration of Cervical Lesions: Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT04363996 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Two Different Restorative Materials in Restoring Class II Cavities of Primary Molars
NCT06000085 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation Of A New Two-Component Self-Etch Universal Adhesive
NCT01464996 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA