L-PRF Versus Sticky Bone Grafting of the Jumping Gap in AI-assisted Computer-Guided Socket Shield Immediate Implantation
NCT07433920 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 45
Last updated 2026-03-18
Summary
the rationale of the current study is to address a focused and clinically relevant gap in socket shield therapy: which biologic modality best supports healing of the shield-implant gap when SST is performed under a standardized, digitally guided workflow. The study will compare three shield-implant gap filling modalities: (i) L-PRF alone (without membrane), (ii) sticky tooth (autogenous dentin graft +i- PRF), and (iii) sticky bone (particulate graft + i- PRF) under AI-assisted, patient-specific guided implant placement based on IOS/CBCT superimposition, with CBCT follow-up at immediate, 3 months, and 6 months. The working hypothesis is that biologically active, cohesive composites (sticky tooth and sticky bone) will provide superior hard- and soft-tissue dimensional stability compared with PRF alone by improving space maintenance and early wound stability in the shield-implant gap . The null hypothesis is that there will be no statistically significant differences between the three modalities in radiographic and digitally assessed clinical outcomes over the 6-month follow-up period .
Conditions
- Dental Implant Failed
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Socket shield with PRF
shield/implant gap will be grafted by PRF alone
- PROCEDURE
-
Sticky tooth group
shield/implant gap will be grafted by sticky tooth graft
- PROCEDURE
-
Sticky bonegroup
shield/implant gap will be grafted by sticky xenograft
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Kafrelsheikh University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-02-23
- Primary Completion
- 2027-03-03
- Completion
- 2027-03-28
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Comparative Study Between Socket Shield Technique Versus Allograft Buccal Sheet Technique on Alveolar Bone Resorption After Immediate Implant Placement
NCT06566001 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement With Connective Tissue Graft or Socket Shield
NCT03594019 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Treatment of Peri-implant Bone Dehiscence Using Autogenous Tooth Plate
NCT06313216 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Dental Implant Installation With and Without Socket Shield Technique in Aesthetic Zone
NCT06881095 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Dimensional Changes of the Labial Alveolar Ridge After Socket Shield Technique With Computer Guided Root Sectioning
NCT05366985 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Atraumatic Zirconia Abutment Versus Customized Composite Healing Abutment in Maxilla or Mandible.
NCT05748379 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of the Accuracy of the Clinical Parameters & Radiographs in Determining the Topography of Implant Bony Lesions
NCT03698851 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Longitudinal Follow-up After C1 Implant Stabilization Values
NCT01746160 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Socket Shield vs Conventional Immediate Implant
NCT03587597 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone
NCT01533571 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Socket Shield Technique for Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement: A 6-Year Clinical Tria
NCT07171866 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dental Implant Stability Placed in Healed Bony Sites Using Oversized Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Protocol
NCT06917638 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate vs Delayed Placement of Straumann BLX Implants in Molar Extraction Sockets
NCT04327284 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Evaluation of Dental Implants Placed in Preserved and Non-preserved Post-extraction Ridges
NCT03715439 ·Status: WITHDRAWN
-
Healing Outcomes of Peri-implant Soft Tissues With Different Healing Abutments
NCT07249242 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Site Preparation With Piezosurgery vs Conventional Drills in Terms of Operation Time, Implant Stability and Bone Density
NCT05512273 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Implant Stability Following Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation Through Piezoelectric Trans-crestal Approach Versus Crestal Implant Approach
NCT07433868 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement Using the Socket Shield Technique in Maxillary Esthetic Zone
NCT07082634 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Different Wound Closure Methods in Immediate Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Zone
NCT05127629 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
L-PRF for Increasing Keratinised Mucosa Around Implants
NCT03190226 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
: SOCKET SHIELD TECHNIQUE VERSUS EMPTY SOCKET TECHNIQUE
NCT02992366 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cost Effectiveness of Various Implant Placement Protocols in the Esthetic Zone
NCT05940662 ·Status: SUSPENDED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediately Placed Implants (Type 1) and Early Placed Implants (Type 2)
NCT01623739 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement With Immediate Professionalization in Aesthetic Area
NCT03665025 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Labial Bone Thickness Around Immediate Implants in the Esthetic Zone Following a Novel Socket Evaluation System
NCT06648135 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING