Cost Effectiveness of Various Implant Placement Protocols in the Esthetic Zone
NCT05940662 · Status: SUSPENDED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 160
Last updated 2025-09-23
Summary
Loss of teeth in the anterior upper jaw significantly affects both well-being and chewing function. Nowadays, dental implants are the treatment of choice for replacing missing teeth with fixed dental prostheses and are often placed in the anterior upper jaw.
Depending on various patient-related factors, protocols for the placement of dental implants involve the following time points after tooth extraction:
1. On the same day (immediate implantation)
2. After 1-4 months (early implantation)
3. After more than 4 months (late implantation).
The different treatment protocols have been investigated over long periods. The choice of the individually suitable treatment protocol for dental implantation depends on many factors and is of utmost importance in order to achieve the best possible treatment outcomes. Selecting an inappropriate treatment protocol would otherwise result in an increased risk of failure.
After decades of research and development in dental implantology, an expert association (International Team for Implantology, ITI) published an evidence-based decision management tool in 2022. This decision management tool assists dentists in choosing the individually suitable implant treatment protocol for single-tooth replacement in the upper jaw. A structured examination of the tooth to be extracted allows to classify the situation and select the most suitable treatment protocol for the individual situation. The treatment protocols differ in terms of time and material requirements, which are associated with different costs.
There is limited data about the cost-effectiveness of these treatment protocols. The present study aims to assess how the costs of the three treatment protocols differ in relation to treatment success.
Conditions
- Esthetic Zone
- Single Tooth Lost
- Accuracy of Dental Implants
- Dimensional Changes
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures
- Implant Survival and Success
- Cost-effectiveness
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Complications
- Frequency of Treatment Protocol
- Single Tooth Dental Implant
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Immediate Implant Placement
The extraction of the failing tooth will be carried out. Subsequently, immediate implant placement and bone grafting of the intra-alveolar space by the means of a well-documented xenogeneic bone substitute will be carried out, will be conducted all in one single surgical intervention. After a healing period of at least 8 weeks, implant reopening takes place (conventional loading protocol).
- PROCEDURE
-
Early Implant Placement
The extraction of the failing tooth will be carried out. Within a healing period of 4-16 weeks, the extraction socket will be completely covered by soft tissues. Implant placement and bone grafting by the means of guided bone regeneration using locally harvested autogenous bone and a well-documented xenogeneic bone substitute will be carried out. After a healing period of at least 8 weeks, implant reopening takes place (conventional loading protocol).
- PROCEDURE
-
Late Implant Placement
The extraction of the failing tooth and a socket grafting procedure using a well-documented xenogeneic bone substitute will be carried out. Within a healing period of at least 16 weeks, the extraction socket will be completely covered by soft tissues and complete bone healing is anticipated. Implant placement and bone grafting by the means of guided bone regeneration using locally harvested autogenous bone and a well-documented xenogeneic bone substitute will be carried out. After a healing period of at least 8 weeks, implant reopening takes place (conventional loading protocol).
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Bern
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Clemens Raabe · Klinik für Oralchirurgie und Stomatologie, Universität Bern
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2029-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2032-01-01
- Completion
- 2040-01-01
Countries
- Switzerland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone
NCT01533571 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Loading of Implants in Totally Edentate Upper and Lower Jaw. Trial to Evaluate Survival of the Implants and Bridges, Quality of Prosthetic Work and Patient Satisfaction
NCT00147992 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Timing of Implant Placement on Early Healing Molecular Events
NCT06276335 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Removable Prosthesis Retained by 4 Implant-supported Locator-Attachments
NCT02380404 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Immedaite vs Early Implant Placement in Aesthetic Area
NCT04653025 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Long-term Effectiveness of Contour Augmentation in Sites With Early Implant Placement
NCT03252106 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Dimensional Changes Following Immediate Implant Placement in Molar Extraction Sockets With or Without Bone Graft
NCT06207617 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Implant Phenotype Modification Via GBR and ADM
NCT07082244 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement
NCT02814149 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Vs. Early Loading of Immediately Placed Implants
NCT05869292 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Study of Early Loading of Implants in the Maxillary Anterior Region With Alveolar Bone Defects
NCT06068231 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Impact of Immediate Implant Placement on Alveolar Ridge Preservation Techniques
NCT03422458 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Loading of Implants in the Partially or Completely Edentulous Jaw
NCT02661412 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Immediate Implant Placement in Fresh Extraction Sockets and Delayed Implants in Healed Sockets.
NCT04346706 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation and Static Template in Completely Edentulous Patients
NCT06051266 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Partially-guided Protocol for Maxillary Overdentures Retained by Ti-Zr One-piece Mini Implants
NCT06081192 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcomes of Immediate Implant Placement and Early Implant Placement
NCT04029324 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
One-abutment One-time for Immediate Restoration Procedure in the Esthetic Zone
NCT04139512 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
The Evaluation of Facial Bone Changes After Early Implant Placement Protocols "Clinically and Radiographically".
NCT06165913 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of MBL Around Implants Placed in Crestal or Subcrestal Positions: a RCT
NCT03806608 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Crestal Bone Changes Following Equi-crestal Versus Subcrestal Implant Placement
NCT06760442 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of the Single Implant-retained Mandibular Overdenture Treatment
NCT01801566 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Osteoimplant and Bone Healing
NCT06664060 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
Immediate Versus Delayed Loading of Maxillary Overdenture Implants
NCT06038487 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Dimensional Changes of Peri-implant Facial Bone
NCT01821092 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4