Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Different Wound Closure Methods in Immediate Implant Placement in the Aesthetic Zone
NCT05127629 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2022-03-31
Summary
Implant-supported restorations have become one of the best treatment options for patients with tooth loss, with predictable long-term success rates and clinical outcomes. Immediate implant placement means the implant is placed immediately after tooth extraction. It can significantly reduce treatment time because extraction socket healing and implant osseointegration occur simultaneously. Immediate implant placement has many benefits, reducing the overall treatment time, reducing the patient's surgical procedures, and reducing surgical trauma (no flap reversal). However, the treatment also has significant limitations, including the inability to predict the possibility of bone and soft tissue healing, and the possibility of subsequent unfavorable esthetic outcomes. However, the evidence regarding soft and hard tissue and aesthetic outcomes in patients treated with immediate implants in the aesthetic area remains inconclusive. As the aesthetic success of implant restorations is increasingly valued over implant survival, there are significant clinical benefits to addressing immediate implant bone tissue resorption and soft tissue deficiencies and improving the aesthetic outcome of immediate implant restorations.
To address the potential health and aesthetic problems associated with soft and hard tissue deficiencies around dental implants, bone grafting in the jumping gap and soft tissue grafting procedures are often performed. According to literature, autologous soft tissue grafts have shown the best clinical and histological results in soft tissue regeneration techniques. However, it requires removal of tissue from the patient's donor area, which can add additional trauma. In contrast, gelatin sponges, currently commonly used as wound closure materials, are only hemostatic and rapidly absorbed postoperatively, and do not provide protection of hard and soft tissue augmentation. Collagen matrix has recently been introduced for keratinized gingival augmentation and has shown encouraging results in preclinical and clinical studies, but more information is needed to confirm its clinical efficacy. Mucograft® Seal is a porcine collagen matrix with a bilayer structure, a dense and slowly absorbing layer and a spongy layer that stabilizes blood clots and allows soft tissue cells to penetrate. Human gingival fibroblasts cultured on Mucograft® were demonstrated to have good proliferative properties and cell viability as scaffold material. In dog extraction sites, preliminary results suggest that the combination of Mucograft® and Bio-Oss Collagen may be an effective method for alveolar ridge preservation. Mucograft® Seal can be used in combination with Bio-Oss Collagen® for alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction.
The research hypothesis is that the use of a collagen matrix to seal the wound in immediate implant placement in aesthetic area will reduce buccal bone resorption and increase the width and thickness of the soft tissue at the implant site.
Therefore, we designed this comparative clinical trial in which patients accept immediate implant placement in aesthetic area. The implant is placed after tooth extraction, and bone graft material Bio-Oss Collagen® is placed in the jump gap, and the wound was closed by different means (collagen matrix or gelatin sponge randomly). The clinical examination, CBCT imaging and histological evaluations were performed to compare the differences in clinical efficacy of the two wound closure methods. The primary outcome is the buccal bone thickness change at the immediate implant site 4 months after surgery.
Conditions
- Tooth Fracture
- Tooth Decay
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Immediate implant placement
After tooth extraction, a dental implant is placed immediately.
- PROCEDURE
-
Guided bone regeneration
After implant placement, the gap between implant and the buccal bone wall is filled with Bio-oss collagen.
- PROCEDURE
-
Wound closure with gelatin sponge
After guided bone regeneration, patient in the control group receive gelatin sponge for wound closure.
- PROCEDURE
-
Wound closure with collagen matrix
After guided bone regeneration, patient in the control group receive collagen matrix (Mucograft Seal) for wound closure.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2021-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2022-09-30
- Completion
- 2022-12-31
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Dimensional Changes Following Immediate Implant Placement in Molar Extraction Sockets With or Without Bone Graft
NCT06207617 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Esthetic Outcomes of Single Immediate Implant Placement
NCT02435706 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Bone Augmentation Simultaneous to Implant Removal on the Prognosis of Reimplantation at the Same Site
NCT07078890 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Using Sealing Socket Abutment Technique With Immediate Implant in the Mandibular Molars
NCT03667261 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Socket Shield Technique Versus Allograft Buccal Sheet Technique on Alveolar Bone Resorption After Immediate Implant Placement
NCT06566001 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Implant Placement With Different Materials of Customized Healing Abutment for Guiding Peri-implant Soft Tissue Healing in Posterior Teeth
NCT06645444 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Screw-retained Maxillary Complete Denture With Electric Welded Metal Framework Versus Cast One, Patient Satisfaction Assessment.
NCT04539210 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Bone Volume Changes in Immediate Implant Placement Using Allograft Versus Xenograft in Mandibular Molars
NCT06962878 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Socket Reconstruction Technique and Immediate Implant Placement With Two Different Bone Substitute Materials.
NCT06517030 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Angulated Screw-retained Crowns Following Immediate Implant Placement
NCT04160247 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Accuracy of Implant Placement for Patients With Mandibular Reconstruction Using Dynamic Navigation and Static Guides
NCT06250907 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Buccal Plate Augmentation Using Sticky Bone With Simultaneous Immediate Implant Placement
NCT06642753 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Soft Tissue Changes Around Dental Implants
NCT04265768 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Satisfaction and OHRQoL In Removable Versus Fixed Implant Prostheses
NCT04694209 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Retention, Chewing Efficiency and Masticatory Performance of Partial Dentures Opposing Implant Retained Prosthesis.
NCT05999760 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Timing of Implant Placement on Early Healing Molecular Events
NCT06276335 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Bone Changes Assessment in Screw-Retained Maxillary Complete Denture With Electric Welded Framework Versus Cast One
NCT04548258 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Immediate Dental Implant Installation With and Without Socket Shield Technique in Aesthetic Zone
NCT06881095 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of Superstructure Material on Crestal Bone Resorption and Esthetic Outcome of Dental Implants
NCT02937220 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement
NCT02814149 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Dental Implant Stability Placed in Healed Bony Sites Using Oversized Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Protocol
NCT06917638 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction Using Autogenous Inlay (Sandwich) Eminoplasty Versus Patient Specific Poly Ether-ether Ketone (PEEK) Onlay Implant
NCT03994692 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of On1 Two-stage Abutment With One-stage Abutment on Different Implant Neck Design
NCT06022042 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Comparison Between Protemp and Flowable Light Cure Composite Material for Creating Optimal Gingival Emergence Profile Around Implant
NCT07196293 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Immediate Implant Placement With Titanium Mesh Versus Collagen Membrane in Type II Socket:
NCT06875830 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA