Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Materials
NCT07394751 · Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 20
Last updated 2026-02-06
Summary
The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the performance of three different bioactive restorative materials against a composite resin for a period of 9 months.
This randomized, split-mouth, single-center trial was performed on patients having occlusal caries (ICDAS 3 and 4) in both molars of the same jaw. The restorative materials used were Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-fill (control, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein), Stela (SDI, Australia), Cention Forte (Ivoclar) and Activa BioActive Restorative (Pulpdent, USA). The restorations were evaluated at baseline, 3-6 and 9-month according to FDI-2 criteria, in terms of functional, biological, and aesthetic parameters, by two experienced evaluators.
Conditions
- Dental Caries
- Dental Adhesive Materials
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Tetric N Ceram Bulkfill application
Selective enamel etching was performed with 37% phosphoric acid followed by a universal adhesive system application to all cavity surfaces and LED cured. The bulk-fill composite resin was placed in a single increment according to the manufacturer's recommendations and light-cured for 20 seconds. Excess material was removed using flame-shaped diamond finishing burs. Occlusion was assessed with articulation paper, and premature or undesirable contact points were adjusted as necessary.
- PROCEDURE
-
Cention Forte application
A drop of Cention Primer was mixed in its wheel for 5 seconds and actively applied to the cavity for 10 seconds, followed by gentle air-drying. The Cention Forte capsule was then mixed for 15 seconds in a capsule mixer and placed in bulk into the prepared cavity using the manufacturer's delivery gun. Light curing was performed for 20 seconds with an LED unit (1300 mW/cm²; ZenoLite, President, Germany). Excess material was removed using flame-shaped diamond finishing burs. Occlusion was assessed with articulation paper, and any premature or undesirable contact points were adjusted accordingly. Final polishing was performed with OptraGloss polishing wheels (Ivoclar Vivadent) for 20 seconds.
- PROCEDURE
-
Stela Automix
Stela Primer was applied to the cavity surfaces and margins for 10 seconds. After a 5-second waiting period, the primer was gently air-dried for 2-3 seconds. The Stela Automix injector tip was then angled as needed and inserted into the cavity to deliver the material. The restoration was allowed to self-cure for 4 minutes. Occlusion was evaluated using articulation paper, and any premature or undesired contact points were adjusted as necessary. Final polishing was performed with OptraGloss polishing wheels (Ivoclar Vivadent) for 20 seconds.
- PROCEDURE
-
Activa BioActive Restorative
Selective enamel etching was performed with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds, followed by thorough rinsing and air-drying. A universal adhesive system (Tetric N-Bond Universal, Ivoclar Vivadent) was applied to all cavity surfaces, including enamel, for 20 seconds, air-thinned, and light-cured for 20 seconds using an LED unit (1300 mW/cm²; ZenoLite, President, Germany). Following the manufacturer's instructions, the placement tip was inserted into the cavity using the dedicated placement gun, and the material was delivered in bulk. Light curing was performed for 20 seconds. Excess material was removed using flame-shaped diamond finishing burs. Occlusion was assessed with articulation paper, and premature or undesirable contact points were adjusted as needed. Final polishing was performed with OptraGloss polishing wheels (Ivoclar Vivadent) for 20 seconds.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ege University
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Cankut Canevi, DDS · Ege University School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 20 Years
- Max Age
- 34 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-11-01
- Primary Completion
- 2025-04-01
- Completion
- 2026-11-01
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Clinical Performances of 3-different Tooth-colored Restorative Materials in Class-II Cavities
NCT06211582 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Esthetics of Dental Composite and Adhesive System
NCT03716349 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Influence of the Composition of Temporary Restorative Material in Vital Teeth
NCT03437655 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of an Innovative Self-cure Bulk-Fill Composite Compared to Dual-Cure and Light-Cure Bulk-Fill Composite in Posterior Restorations.
NCT07410468 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Three Different Universal Adhesives in Non-carious Cervical Lesions
NCT03415412 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Trial With Two New Tooth-colored Restorative Materials in Class I/II Cavities
NCT05748327 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Three Dental Adhesive Systems in Class V Restorations
NCT00643461 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Clinical Comparison of Universal Adhesives in Terms of Different Application Modes on the Restoration of NCCLs
NCT03415516 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laser Etching Effect on Application Mode of Universal Adhesive
NCT04814836 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Remineralization of Early Carious Lesion Using Natural Agents Versus Bioadhesive Polymers
NCT04390256 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Long Term Clinical Evaluation of a Posterior Glass Hybrid System vs. Composite Resin
NCT02717520 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Compomer and Composite Class II Restorations in Primary Molars: 24 Months Results
NCT04678141 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A 24-month Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-fill Restorative Resins in Class II Restorations
NCT03527953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Comparison of Resin-hybrid Ceramic Restorations Produced Using a Computer-aided Design/Computer-aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) System With Fiber-reinforced Composite Restorations
NCT06496126 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
NCT04293770 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Resin Polymer (NuSmile BioFlx) Compared to Stainless Steel Crowns (3M ESPE) for Restoration of Primary Molar Teeth
NCT06354634 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Bioactive Versus Non-Bioactive Restorative System in Deep Carious Molars
NCT06348953 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
TetricCAD Crown Clinical Study
NCT03716817 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Clinical Evaluation of a Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) Based Restorative System Versus Bulk Filled Resin-based Composite
NCT02479711 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
NCT04838483 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Bulk-Fill Composite Resins in Class II Restorations
NCT06212141 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Restorative Treatment of Severe Tooth Wear; Direct vs Indirect
NCT04326816 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Performance of Novel Alkasite Restorative Material "Cention Forte" in Class II Restorations
NCT06833528 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Patients Risk Factors on the Longevity of Aesthetic Restorations
NCT03834636 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3