Reinforced Versus Conventional Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Low Rectal Cancer Resection: A Comparative Study
NCT07346534 · Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 300
Last updated 2026-01-16
Summary
Study Description This prospective, controlled clinical study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of reinforced anastomosis using 8-10 interrupted sutures versus the conventional Dixon procedure in patients undergoing laparoscopic low anterior resection for low rectal cancer. Anastomotic leakage remains one of the most significant postoperative complications following low rectal cancer surgery, particularly in laparoscopic procedures due to limited tactile feedback and maneuverability in the pelvic cavity.
Reinforcement of the anastomotic site through additional interrupted suturing may provide better mechanical strength and improved healing, potentially reducing the incidence of anastomotic leakage and related morbidities. In this study, eligible patients will be assigned to receive either a conventional laparoscopic Dixon procedure or the same procedure with added reinforcement of the anastomosis using 8-10 interrupted sutures circumferentially.
Perioperative outcomes including the rate of anastomotic leakage, postoperative complications, operation time, length of hospital stay, return of bowel function, and quality of life will be assessed and compared between the two groups. The study seeks to provide evidence for optimizing surgical techniques in low rectal cancer treatment and improving patient prognosis.
Conditions
- Low Rectal Cancer
- Rectal Neoplasms
- Colorectal Cancer
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Reinforced Anastomotic Suturing (8-10 Interrupted Sutures)
After completing the laparoscopic low anterior resection (Dixon procedure) for low rectal cancer, the surgeon performs additional reinforcement of the colorectal anastomosis. This is done by placing 8 to 10 interrupted seromuscular sutures circumferentially around the anastomotic site. The goal of this reinforcement is to enhance anastomotic stability, promote healing, and reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage.
- PROCEDURE
-
Conventional Laparoscopic Dixon Procedure
Patients undergo standard laparoscopic low anterior resection (Dixon procedure) for low rectal cancer. The colorectal anastomosis is performed using a circular stapler without any additional suturing or reinforcement. This represents the conventional surgical approach widely used in clinical practice.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Shanghai 10th People's Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- NON_RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 85 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-06-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-12-30
- Completion
- 2026-12-30
Countries
- China
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Safety and Efficacy of Reduced-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients Of Colon and Upper Rectal Cancer
NCT05953662 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study on Effect of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgical Technology on Genitourinary Function After Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
NCT06409403 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Assisted Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery for Rectal Cancer in Low Site
NCT03422835 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Completely Abdominal Approach Laparoscopic Partial Intersphincteric Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT04481659 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopy-Assisted Surgery for Carcinoma of the Low Rectum
NCT01899547 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Intracorporeal Anastomosis for Colorectal Surgery- A Multiple Center Real World Study
NCT05911152 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
The Effect of Different Reconstruction Methods on Anterior Resection Syndrome
NCT04023448 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Side-to-end Anastomosis Versus Colon J Pouch for Reconstruction After Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer (SAVE)
NCT01006577 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
NCT02966483 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of AL Prediction for Rectal Cancer
NCT05610904 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Exploring the Effect of Colonic J-pouch in Anorectal Preservation Surgery for Ultra-low Rectal Cancer.
NCT06601985 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Oncological Differences Between Transanal and Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
NCT05201885 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Safety Study of Transumbilical Single Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT02117557 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
A Prediction Model of Anastomotic Stricture After Rectal Cancer
NCT06404554 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Robotic Top-down Intersphincteric Resection
NCT05961969 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Bacteriological Differences Between Transanal and Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
NCT05201872 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Effects of Modified Precision Functional Sphincter-Preserving Surgery (PPS) on Ultralow Rectal Cancer
NCT05245565 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
J-Pouch vs Side-to-End Anastomosis After Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT02627729 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Patient Reported Outcomes Following Cancer of the Rectum
NCT04936581 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: a Target Trial Emulation
NCT06814093 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Utility of Cable Tie to Decline Reloads in Laparoscopic Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer
NCT03570684 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Comparison Between Traditional Laparoscopy-assisted Surgery and NOSES in Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer
NCT03470142 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transanal Inspection and Management of Low ColoRectal Anastomosis Performed With a New Technique
NCT02879370 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Visceral Obesity in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis
NCT06397053 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Complete Versus Partial Preservation of Denonvilliers' Fascia on Urogenital Function in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
NCT04672603 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA