MedTrace Logo

Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Parks and Bacon Techniques in Low Rectal Cancer

NCT05943444 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 256

Last updated 2025-12-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this study is to compare the postoperative anal function of patients with ultra-low rectal cancer after Parks operation (colon anal anastomosis) and Bacon operation (colon anal pull-out anastomosis), which may provide clinical evidence for the improvement of anal function and quality of life.

The main questions it aims to answer are: the difference of anal function 1 year after surgery type of study: clinical trial participant population: patients with low rectal cancer Participants will receive Parks operation of Bacon operation If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare Parks and Bacon operation to see if the anal function 1 year after surgery is different.

Conditions

  • Rectal Neoplasms
  • Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
  • Anastomotic Leak
  • Quality of Life

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Parks technique

compare different operational styles of low rectal cancer

PROCEDURE

Bacon technique

Bacon technique

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jun Huang, MD · Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2023-08-08
Primary Completion
2027-08-08
Completion
2027-08-08

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05943444 on ClinicalTrials.gov