Single- vs Double-Layer Cesarean Scar Repair and Myometrial Thickness
NCT07323355 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 102
Last updated 2026-01-07
Summary
Cesarean delivery (CD) is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide, with a rising incidence particularly in high-income countries. Although often life-saving, cesarean delivery carries both short- and long-term maternal risks. Early complications include infection, hemorrhage, and thromboembolism, while inadequate uterine healing can lead to future complications such as uterine rupture and placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Additionally, cesarean scars may result in pregnancy complications, isthmocele formation, postmenstrual bleeding, pelvic pain, and dysmenorrhea. This highlights the need for optimization of the surgical technique. Despite increasing cesarean rates, there is no consensus on the optimal uterine closure method. Techniques vary in terms of the number of layers, suture locking style, and inclusion of the endometrium, and their comparative effectiveness in reducing scar defects remains unclear. Some previous studies have reported increased uterine rupture risk with single-layer locked sutures and better healing with double-layer closure, while others found no significant difference in scar outcomes. This study aims to investigate the effects of single- versus double-layer cesarean scar closure on myometrial thickness and its clinical implications.
Conditions
- Caesarean Section
- Cesarean Scar Closure
- Cesarean Scar Defect (Isthmococele)
- Myometrial Thickness
- Postpartum Complications
- Clinical Outcomes
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Double-Layer Cesarean Scar Repair
Participants in this arm undergo double-layer closure of the uterine incision during cesarean delivery. The procedure involves suturing the full thickness of the myometrium in the first layer, followed by a second continuous suture approximating the outer myometrium and serosa. Outcomes such as myometrial thickness, scar integrity, and clinical parameters are measured. This arm is compared in parallel with the single-layer cesarean scar repair arm.
- PROCEDURE
-
Single-Layer Cesarean Scar Repair
Participants in this arm undergo single-layer closure of the uterine incision during cesarean delivery. The procedure involves a single continuous suture approximating the full thickness of the uterine wall. Outcomes such as myometrial thickness, scar integrity, and clinical parameters are measured. This arm is compared in parallel with the double-layer cesarean scar repair arm.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Merve Didem Eşkin Tanrıverdi · Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 44 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-11-11
- Primary Completion
- 2026-09-21
- Completion
- 2026-11-15
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Long Term Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Uterine Cesarean Incision Closure
NCT01289262 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Baseball Suturing on Isthmocele and Residual Myometrial Thickness After Cesarean
NCT04734366 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Development of Isthmocele Symptom Severity and Quality of Life Scale
NCT06562231 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Deficient Lower Segment Cesarean Section Scar, Does the Type of Suture Matter?
NCT03649256 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Double Knots Versus Triple Knots Facia Closure Method; is There a Difference in Pain Sensation or Cosmetic Satisfaction?
NCT06303817 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Suturing Material on Scar Healing
NCT03968783 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
UTERUS CLOSURE TECHNIQUES and Uterine Niche Formation
NCT05517018 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Niche In CEsarean Scar Trial (NICEST)
NCT05312775 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Hysteroscopic "360°" Surgery for Improvement of Symptoms in Cesarean Scar Defects
NCT06917014 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Wound Infection Rates and Cosmetic Results of Different Suture Materials in Cesarean Skin Incision
NCT06119113 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Uterine Closure for Cesarean Section: a Novel Technique
NCT05669300 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
The Impact of Different Skin Suture Methods in Episiotomy Repair on Healing and Pain
NCT06379048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Suture Material and C-Section Scar Niches: A Comparative Study
NCT07101952 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Association Between the Adenomyosis and the Clinical Outcomes of Vaginal Repair of CesareanSectionScar Defects
NCT05187728 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Impact of Single- Versus Double-layer Hysterotomy Closure on Cesarean Niche Development: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06308172 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
CS Scar Impact on ART Outcomes
NCT06021886 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Cesarean Wound Closure in Women With BMI 40 or Greater
NCT02549131 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation the Impact of Subcutaneous Irrigation on Wound Complications
NCT03321175 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cosmetic Results With Tissue Adhesive vs. Subdermal Sutures in Cesarean Section
NCT06760026 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Insitu Repair Versus Uterine Exeriorization During Cesarean Section
NCT01723605 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Zip Incision Approximation vs. Suture for C-Section
NCT02915952 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Therapeutic Effects of VR and Hysteroscope + Laparoscope in the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Diverticula
NCT02933216 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Study to Compare Suture Material in Closure of Uterine Incision in Cesarian Section
NCT02517710 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Pregnancy Outcomes According to Cervical Cerclage Indications and Factors Affecting Pregnancy Duration and Outcomes
NCT06443112 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
EFFECTİVİTY OF CHITOSAN COVERED GAUZE IN POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGIC OBSTETRIC LACERATIONS
NCT06998641 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA