Short Term Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Uterine Cesarean Incision Closure

NCT01287611 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 168

Last updated 2023-09-28

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

Cesarean section (C/S) is an operation most commonly performed in Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics. Complications related with incomplete healing of Kerr uterine incision after C/S (adhesions, separation (dehiscence), endometritis, endometriosis, anomalous placentation in subsequent pregnancies, incomplete or complete uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies, ...) are very important issues. Classically Kerr incision is repaired with continuous locked suturing. Purse string suturing of Kerr incision may reduce the size of the incision and in turn may reduce short and long term complications. For this reason, the investigators aimed to compare two closure techniques.

Conditions

  • Cesarean Section Complications

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Purse string closure technique

Uterine Kerr incision will be closed with purse string suture

PROCEDURE

Continuously locked closure technique

Uterine Kerr incision will be closed with continuously locked suturing

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital

    lead OTHER_GOV

Principal Investigators

  • Yasemin Karsidağ · Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Education and Research Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
40 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-01-31
Primary Completion
2012-02-29
Completion
2012-02-29

Countries

  • Turkey (Türkiye)

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01287611 on ClinicalTrials.gov