Double Knots Versus Triple Knots Facia Closure Method; is There a Difference in Pain Sensation or Cosmetic Satisfaction?
NCT06303817 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 203
Last updated 2024-03-12
Summary
The study included women who were scheduled for an elective or had an emergency cesarean section. Age, body mass index (BMI), obstetric history, education status, smoking status and C-section indications of the patients were recorded. Patients with a previous suprapubic scar, medical conditions affecting wound healing (such as diabetes or chronic corticosteroid use), those needing a vertical incision (e.g., placenta previa), individuals with postoperative wound infection or under 18 years old were excluded. Data were collected in standardized data form by a research assistant. Pre- and post-surgery treatments and/or interventions were standardized. All patients received antimicrobial prophylaxis with cefazolin before the operation. The abdomen was entered via a transverse suprapubic skin incision and the surgical steps up to the point of facia closure were accomplished in a standard fashion. Technical differences such as blunt and sharp dissection, uterus exteriorization vs in situ, or parietal peritoneum closure were left to the surgeon's discretion. The procedures for facia closure are as follows; in Group I (Double knots group), the edge of the fascia was determined with a Kocher clamp. The fascia was closed starting from the opposite side with a synthetic absorbable multifilament suture in a continuous fashion up to the Kocher clamp and tied the knots with the same single suture (Figure 2; a-b). In Group II (Triple knots group), the edge of the fascia was fixed with the same suture material instead of the Kocher clamp, and the fascia was closed similarly, starting from the opposite corner via the second loop. Then the loops from the first suture were tied to the second suture (Figure 2; c-d). After the incision was irrigated with sterile saline solution, the subcutaneous space was closed if the thickness was 2 cm or more. Skin closure was accomplished with a subcuticular technique using a non-absorbable monofilament suture, which was removed on the 10th day postoperatively. A closed subcutaneous suction drain was not used in any of the patients. Postoperative pain at and around the incision line was measured on the 1st, and 10th days postoperatively on the NRS (Numeric Rating Scale), with "0" being "no pain" and "10" being "the worst pain imaginable." The 1st measurements were made face-to-face, and the 10th-day evaluation was made via telephone interviews by the same research assistant.
Conditions
- Cesarean Section
- Pain
- Cosmetics Sensitivity
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Double knots facia closure method during cesarean section
In Group I (double knots group), the edge of the fascia was identified with a Kocher clamp. A synthetic absorbable multifilament suture was used to close the fascia in a continuous fashion, starting from the opposite side up to the Kocher clamp. The knots were tied with the same single suture. I
- OTHER
-
Triple knots facia closure method during cesarean section
n Group II (triple knots group), the edge of the fascia was fixed with the same suture material instead of the Kocher clamp. The fascia was closed similarly, starting from the opposite corner via the second loop. The loops from the first suture were tied to the second suture.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Adana City Training and Research Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Sevda Baş, M.D. · Adana City Training and Research Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2022-03-01
- Primary Completion
- 2022-06-01
- Completion
- 2023-01-01
Countries
- Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Long Term Comparison of Two Different Techniques of Uterine Cesarean Incision Closure
NCT01289262 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Single- vs Double-Layer Cesarean Scar Repair and Myometrial Thickness
NCT07323355 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Effect of Suturing Material on Scar Healing
NCT03968783 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Closure Versus Non Closure of Subcutaneous Tissue After Cesarean Section in Diabetic Patients
NCT02664285 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Study in Different Sutures Techniques in Reduction of Known Abdominoplasty Complications and Improving Patients' Post-operative Outcomes
NCT05490602 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
The Impact of Different Skin Suture Methods in Episiotomy Repair on Healing and Pain
NCT06379048 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Fascial Closure Techniques Post-Operative Pain Laparoscopy
NCT03254056 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cesarean Wound Closure in Women With BMI 40 or Greater
NCT02549131 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison the Effect of Uterine Closure Technique Difference on Uterine Niche After Caesarean Delivery.
NCT04799457 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Subcuticular Suture Versus Staples for Closure of the Skin After Caesarean Section.
NCT01217567 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Repair of Cesarean Scar Niche
NCT04307524 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Postoperative Pain and Skin Closure Methods After Cesarean Section
NCT02028000 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation the Impact of Subcutaneous Irrigation on Wound Complications
NCT03321175 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study to Compare Suture Material in Closure of Uterine Incision in Cesarian Section
NCT02517710 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Wound Closure Techniques
NCT00282633 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Can Cesarean Scar Defects be Prevented?
NCT06761495 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Investigation of Continuous Versus Interrupted Subcutaneous Fat Closure in Reducing Surgical Site Infection
NCT05856968 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cosmetic Results With Tissue Adhesive vs. Subdermal Sutures in Cesarean Section
NCT06760026 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Wound Infection Rates and Cosmetic Results of Different Suture Materials in Cesarean Skin Incision
NCT06119113 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Aesthetic Outcome of Intra-dermal Versus Transcutaneous Purse-string Closure
NCT06448481 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Cosmetic Outcomes With Tissue Adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) or Staples in Repeated Cesarean Section
NCT04302597 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Skin Closures at Cesarean Delivery, Glue vs Subcuticular Sutures.
NCT04371549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Insitu Repair Versus Uterine Exeriorization During Cesarean Section
NCT01723605 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Cesarean Wound Closure: Dermabond Versus Steri Strips
NCT04621994 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Skin Closure Techniques on Body Image in Women Undergoing Gynecologic Surgery
NCT07327125 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA