Suture Material and C-Section Scar Niches: A Comparative Study
NCT07101952 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 250
Last updated 2025-08-03
Summary
Defective healing of the uterine wound after a Cesarean section (CS) can lead to the formation of a CS niche (CSN). The specific technique used for closure and the type of suture material chosen are often overlooked factors that might contribute to the development of these niches. This study aimed to compare how frequently CSNs occur when the CS hysterotomy is closed using barbed suture material versus conventional vicryl suture material, with assessments primarily done via transvaginal ultrasound (TVS).
The methodology involved closing the CS hysterotomy with a double-layer technique using unlocked continuous running sutures, where the first layer included the decidua and was overlapped by the second. Researchers evaluated several aspects, including the duration and feasibility of the hysterotomy closure, the grade of postoperative pain, and the length of hospital stay. Transvaginal ultrasounds were conducted monthly for three months post-operatively to monitor for CSN development and to gather descriptive measurements of any niches found. The absence of a CSN was considered an indicator of surgical success.
Conditions
- Cesarean Section Complications
Interventions
- OTHER
-
Braded Suture material
The Cesarean section hysterotomy was closed using a double-layer technique involving unlocked continuous running sutures. The first layer incorporated the decidua, which was then overlapped by the second. The suture material used for this closure was barbed suture; which is absorbable synthetic monofilament polydioxanone with bars.
- OTHER
-
Multifilament vicryl suture material
The Cesarean section hysterotomy was closed using a double-layer technique involving unlocked continuous running sutures. The first layer incorporated the decidua, which was then overlapped by the second. The suture material used for this closure was barbed suture; which is absorbable synthetic monofilament polydioxanone with bars.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Benha University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 22 Years
- Max Age
- 47 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2024-07-12
- Primary Completion
- 2024-09-15
- Completion
- 2024-10-25
Countries
- Egypt
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Difference Between Monofilament Versus Multifilament Suture Material in Isthmocele Formation
NCT06741371 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Clinical Study Based on Comparison Between Closure of Uterine Incision With Vicryl 2/0 Versus Vicryl 1 in Development of Uterine Niche.
NCT05770115 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Wound Infection Rates and Cosmetic Results of Different Suture Materials in Cesarean Skin Incision
NCT06119113 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cosmetic Results With Tissue Adhesive vs. Subdermal Sutures in Cesarean Section
NCT06760026 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Repair of Cesarean Scar Niche
NCT04307524 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Niche In CEsarean Scar Trial (NICEST)
NCT05312775 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Interrupted Versus Continuous Subcuticular Skin Suturing in Elective Cesarean Section.
NCT03120806 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Double Knots Versus Triple Knots Facia Closure Method; is There a Difference in Pain Sensation or Cosmetic Satisfaction?
NCT06303817 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Study to Compare Suture Material in Closure of Uterine Incision in Cesarian Section
NCT02517710 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Barbed Suture for Hysterotomy Closure During Cesarean Section
NCT04622267 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cesarean Wound Closure: Dermabond Versus Steri Strips
NCT04621994 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Subcuticular Skin Closure at Cesarean Delivery
NCT03536832 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Subcuticular Suture for Cesarean Skin Incision Closure
NCT02459093 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Uterine Closure at C-section by Stratafix Tissue Control Device: Randomized Case-Control Study
NCT02288013 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Double-layer Versus Purse Uterine Closure Techniques : Impact on Residual Myometrial Thickness After Cesarean
NCT04871022 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Insitu Repair Versus Uterine Exeriorization During Cesarean Section
NCT01723605 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Cosmetic Outcomes With Tissue Adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) or Staples in Repeated Cesarean Section
NCT04302597 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
UTERUS CLOSURE TECHNIQUES and Uterine Niche Formation
NCT05517018 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Can Cesarean Scar Defects be Prevented?
NCT06761495 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Deficient Lower Segment Cesarean Section Scar, Does the Type of Suture Matter?
NCT03649256 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Immunohistopathologic Findings of Cesarean Scar Niche
NCT06466343 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Skin Closures at Cesarean Delivery, Glue vs Subcuticular Sutures.
NCT04371549 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Hysteroscopic "360°" Surgery for Improvement of Symptoms in Cesarean Scar Defects
NCT06917014 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Closure Versus Non Closure of Subcutaneous Tissue After Cesarean Section in Diabetic Patients
NCT02664285 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Impact of Single- Versus Double-layer Hysterotomy Closure on Cesarean Niche Development: a Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06308172 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA