Double-layer Versus Purse Uterine Closure Techniques : Impact on Residual Myometrial Thickness After Cesarean

NCT04871022 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 126

Last updated 2022-09-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

There are different surgical techniques of uterine closure during cesarean. Currently data suggest that the double layer unlocked closure technique is associated with better uterine scar healing, and this technique is considered the gold standard.

This study compares two techniques of uterine closure on myometrium thickness:

1. Double layer unlocked suture;
2. Purse suture of the uterus with a first continuous purse suture of the deep portion of the myometrium and a second unlocked continuous suture including the remaining part of the myometrium.

The primary outcome is the mean residual myometrium thickness at the site of the uterine scar evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound at six months after cesarean.

Conditions

  • Uterine Scar Defect

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Double layer closure of the hysterotomy

Double layer closure with a first continuous unlocked suture of the deep portion of the myometrium and a second unlocked continuous suture that approximate the upper portion of the myometrium.

PROCEDURE

Purse closure of the hysterotomy

Purse suture of the uterus with a first continuous purse suture of the deep portion of the myometrium and a second unlocked continuous suture including the remaining part of the myometrium

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Tunis El Manar

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
48 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2021-05-15
Primary Completion
2022-03-31
Completion
2022-07-01

Countries

  • Tunisia

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT04871022 on ClinicalTrials.gov