Modified Mini-Open TLIF vs Traditional Open TLIF
NCT07279051 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 224
Last updated 2025-12-12
Summary
This clinical study aims to find out if a modified mini-open spine surgery (modified mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,mMO-TLIF) is as good as, or better than, the traditional open surgery (traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,traditional TLIF) for treating low back pain, leg pain, and walking difficulties caused by lumbar spinal stenosis with instability. The study will also look at the safety of both surgeries.
It is designed to answer these main questions:
Is the mMO-TLIF surgery as good as the traditional TLIF surgery at improving patients' lower back function and quality of life? Does the mMO-TLIF surgery reduce blood loss during the operation and shorten hospital stays and recovery time? What medical problems (like infections or nerve injuries) might patients experience after having the mMO-TLIF surgery? Researchers will compare the results of the mMO-TLIF surgery group with the traditional TLIF surgery group to see which one works better.
Participants will:
Be randomly assigned to receive either the mMO-TLIF minimally invasive surgery or the traditional TLIF open surgery.
Come back to the hospital for check-ups before surgery, and then at 1 month, 3 months, 12 months and 24 months after surgery.
During these check-ups, they will have physical exams, fill out questionnaires about their symptoms, dysfunction and quality of life, and get X-rays or CT scans to see how their bones are healing.
Conditions
- Spinal Stenosis Lumbar
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
modified mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
The modified Mini-Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (mMO-TLIF) is a hybrid technique that integrates minimally invasive and open concepts. Its core principle involves a limited open exposure on the decompression side for canal decompression and interbody fusion using retractors, while the non-decompression side undergoes pure percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, thereby maximally preserving the paraspinal muscles. This approach effectively balances surgical visualization with tissue preservation, achieving robust internal fixation while significantly reducing muscle injury, intraoperative blood loss, and enhancing surgical efficiency, making it particularly suitable for multi-level fusion.
- PROCEDURE
-
traditional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Traditional Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) is a classic posterior surgical approach for lumbar pathologies. It utilizes a posterior midline incision with extensive dissection and retraction of paraspinal muscles to achieve adequate exposure, allowing for discectomy, neural decompression, and interbody fusion through a unilateral transforaminal approach, typically supplemented with bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation. Advantages: Excellent surgical exposure and large working space facilitating thorough neural decompression and providing reliable spinal stability. Disadvantages: Extensive dissection of paraspinal soft tissues may lead to postoperative chronic muscle denervation and low back pain; associated with significant intraoperative blood loss and a prolonged recovery period.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 80 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-12-06
- Primary Completion
- 2028-05-01
- Completion
- 2028-05-01
More Related Trials
-
Minuteman Spinal Fusion Implant Versus Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT01455805 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
MIS-D Versus MIS-TLIF for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT04318795 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Unilateral Versus Bilateral TLIF for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
NCT03856554 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Is it Really Necessary Going All Over the Top in Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis?
NCT07026305 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Decompressive Laminectomy Versus Laminectomy With Transpedicular Fixation in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT07281625 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: EARLY_PHASE1
-
LLIF Plus Posterior Decompression for Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT04094220 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Outcomes of Conventional TLIF With Posterior Decompression Surgery Versus Endoscopic Foraminotomy Surgery
NCT06685575 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Crenel Lateral Interbody Fusion Combined With Lateral Plate Fixation for LSS Combined With Lumbar Instability
NCT06058143 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Degenerative One-level Stenosis of Lumbar Spine
NCT03748277 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Decompression and Fusion Versus Open for Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis
NCT04594980 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Effect of Lumbar Spinal Manipulation, Physical Therapy and Surgical Management in the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT03118206 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of Treatment Effect of Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery
NCT05190055 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Treatment Modalities
NCT06686407 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Of A Novel Hand-held Retractor-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion By The Wiltse Approach And Posterior TLIF
NCT06052579 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Preventive Effect of Limited Decompression on Adjacent Segment Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT04469387 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Complications Rate and Treatment Costs of Mini-TLIF and MIDLIF in the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT07127380 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
RPE-P/TLIF for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Instability
NCT06290908 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Unilateral or Bilateral Fixation in the Treatment of LFS
NCT02985138 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Traditional Open Surgery In The Treatment Of Single Level Lumbar Stenosis
NCT04408846 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Modified Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion VS. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Adult Degenerative Scoliosis
NCT04071665 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcome Study of Minimally Invasive Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT00737607 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Clinical Study of Bilateral Decompression With Interbody Fusion for Spondylolisthesis
NCT02972190 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Study on the Clinical Use of a New Expandable OLIF Cage With Posterior Bone Grafting in Lumbar Spine Surgery
NCT07028099 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Microdecompression Versus Open Laminectomy and Posterior Stabilization for Multilevel Lumbar Spine Stenosis
NCT04087694 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimal Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar and Lumbosacral Spine Diseases
NCT06545032 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA