Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Complications Rate and Treatment Costs of Mini-TLIF and MIDLIF in the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT07127380 · Status: RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2026-04-15
Summary
Background
Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is the leading cause of lower back pain and disability, which prevalence increasing with age. When conservative treatment fails, surgical methods of spinal fusion are employed. Minimally invasive techniques, including minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF), have well-documented advantages over traditional open transforaminal interbody fusion (open-TLIF). However, data comparing these two minimally invasive methods in treating DDD are minimal and sometimes contradictory. I am running a few minutes late; my previous meeting is running over.
Methods This is a prospective, randomized, partially blinded, two-arm trial aiming to compare the outcomes, complications, and treatment costs of MIS-TLIF and MIDLIF in patients with discogenic low back pain. A total of 100 adult patients with lumbosacral spine pain and radicular symptoms, unresponsive to conservative treatment for over one year, will be enrolled. Patients will be randomized (1:1) into two arms: MIS-TLIF (control, n=50) and MIDLIF (intervention, n=50), with a 12-month follow-up. Inclusion criteria include age ≥18 years and discopathy at one or two levels requiring interbody stabilization. Exclusion criteria include multilevel pathology, spinal deformities, and pain causes other than degenerative disease. Primary endpoints assess pain (VAS, NRS scales), disability (COMI, ODI questionnaires), and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L questionnaire) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-surgery. Secondary endpoints include complication rates (nerve root damage, infections), costs (hospitalization, implants), length of hospital stay, procedure duration, blood loss, morphometric parameters (intervertebral space height), and adjacent segment disease based on imaging studies (MRI, CT, X-ray). Data analysis uses parametric/non-parametric tests (e.g., t-test, Mann-Whitney) in the R software. The trial adheres to the Helsinki Declaration, with ethics approval (no. 112/2024).
Discussion Data on the comparison of MIDLIF and MIS-TLIF in treating DDD are minimal and inconsistent. Some reports have advantaged MIDLIF in shorter operative time, decreased intraoperative blood loss, and reduced hospital stays, while others favor MIS-TLIF. This trial addresses these gaps by providing high-quality evidence on clinical superiority, cost-effectiveness, and long-term outcomes compering MIDLIF and MIS-TLIF. There is a high need for a high-quality, prospective study to examine this problem.
Conditions
- Lower Back Pain Chronic
- Lumbar Degenerative Disease
- Lumbar Disc Degeneration
- Degenerative Disc Disease(DDD)
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Midline Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIDLIF)
Midline Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIDLIF) is a procedure utilizes a medial approach to the spine, involving the retraction of the segmental back muscles to expose the lamine and articular processes. Screw placement is medialized, with entry to a point along the pars intercularis or joint surface. It places the screw through potentially more cortical and stronger bone. Decompression is achieved by resecting the inferior articular process and lamina marginalis, followed by a discectomy. Subsequently, a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is performed to place an interbody cage and promote fusion.
- PROCEDURE
-
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (mini-TLIF)
Minimally invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (mini-TLIF) is a procedure that employs a percutaneous approach for pedicle screw placement through the pedicles. Decompression is performed using a lateral approach, with 2-3 cm lateral to the ipsilateral borders. This is followed by resection of the inferior articular process and removal of the ligamentum flavum, facilitating discectomy. An interbody cage is then inserted to achieve fusion.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Copernicus Memorial Hospital
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2025-01-19
- Primary Completion
- 2028-01-19
- Completion
- 2028-01-31
Countries
- Poland
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Following Unilateral or Bilateral Posterior Fixation in MI-TLIF
NCT01996371 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Minimal Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar and Lumbosacral Spine Diseases
NCT06545032 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Minimally Invasive Surgery Techniques for One-level Degenerative Lumbar Deformities Correction
NCT03908203 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Mini-Open TLIF vs Traditional Open TLIF
NCT07279051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Percutaneous Minimal Invasive Pedicular Screw and Rod Insertion in Circumferential Lumbar Fusion
NCT01513577 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Lumbar Discopathy Decompression with Lateral Interbody Fusion: Radiological and Clinical Outcomes
NCT06719349 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Evaluation of Treatment Effect of Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery
NCT05190055 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Degenerative One-level Stenosis of Lumbar Spine
NCT03748277 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
NCT04073563 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
TLIF Osteo3 ZP Putty Study (Also Known as the TOP Fusion Study)
NCT05114135 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Minuteman Spinal Fusion Implant Versus Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT01455805 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Unilateral Versus Bilateral TLIF for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
NCT03856554 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT03726190 ·Status: SUSPENDED
-
Safety and Performance of the Hexanium TLIF System in the Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease
NCT05997121 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Clinical Outcome Study of Minimally Invasive Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT00737607 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT03692845 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Titanium vs. PEEK Fusion Devices in 1 Level TLIF
NCT05691062 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: PHASE4
-
FLXfit Post Market Outcome Study Protocol
NCT02882243 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Post-market Safety and Effectiveness of the CORUS-LX System in Improving Lumbar Interbody Fusion Outcomes
NCT07222787 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Patients With DDD Following TLIF With 3-D Printed Titanium Cage
NCT03018392 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Outcome and Fusion Rate of 3D Printed Interbody Fusion Cages and Titanium Coated PEEK Cages
NCT05237908 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Short-term Clinical Outcome of Cortical Bone Trajectory Compared With the Traditional "Open" and Minimal Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT05538416 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Clinical Trial Comparing Decompression With and Without Coflex™ Interlaminar Technology Treating Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT01316211 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Unilateral or Bilateral Fixation in the Treatment of LFS
NCT02985138 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Total Lumbar Disc Prosthesis and Subsequent Work Activity at at Least Five Years After Total Lumbar Disc Replacement
NCT06989632 ·Status: RECRUITING