MedTrace Logo

Comparative Study Between Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Treatment Modalities

NCT06686407 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 32

Last updated 2024-11-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the clinical and radiological outcome of two different interventional techniques in lumbar foraminal stenosis decompression. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does minimally invasive techniques give better results than conventional techniques?

Participants will:

Undergo minimally invasive intervention using unilateral biportal endoscopy for lumbar foraminal stenosis decompression Undergo lumbar fusion for lumbar foraminal stenosis decompression Keep a diary of their symptoms and improvement of these symptoms

Conditions

  • Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Open lumbar decompression ± fusion

Open lumbar decompression by laminectomy and transpedicular screw fixation using screws and rods ± interbody cage "device"

PROCEDURE

Minimally invasive lumbar foraminal decompression using unilateral biportal endoscopy "device"

A new endoscopic technique that uses a Unilater Biportal Endoscopy for lumbar foraminal decompression

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Assiut University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Wael Mohamed Ali, Assistant Professor · Assiut University

  • Ahmed Hussein Mohamed, Lecturer · Cairo University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2024-11-30
Primary Completion
2026-10-01
Completion
2026-10-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT06686407 on ClinicalTrials.gov