Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws vs. Traditional Pedicle Screws Fixation

NCT03105167 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 108

Last updated 2018-07-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) had been favorable for effectively decrease pain and disability in specific spinal disorders; however, there has been concern regarding pedicle screw placement during TLIF surgery. Recently, several biomechanical studies had demonstrated that CBT technique achieves screw purchase and strength equivalent to or greater than the traditional method. Furthermore, Only 1 report examined the surgical outcomes of TLIF with CBT screws fixation compared with TLIF using traditional pedicle screws fixation. TLIF with CBT screws fixation may be effective for specific spinal disorders, but the evidence supporting this possibility is still limited.

Conditions

  • Spinal Stenosis Lumbar
  • Lumbar Disc Herniation
  • Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

Interventions

PROCEDURE

cortical bone trajectory screws

cortical bone trajectory screws fixation takes the place of traditional pedicle screws fixation will be used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

PROCEDURE

pedicle screws

traditional pedicle screws fixation will be used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2018-05-07
Primary Completion
2020-12-13
Completion
2021-12-13

Countries

  • China

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT03105167 on ClinicalTrials.gov