Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Degenerative One-level Stenosis of Lumbar Spine
NCT03748277 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 132
Last updated 2020-05-14
Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of surgical treatment of one-level central stenosis of the lumbar spine using traditional open approach (PLIF) and a minimally invasive procedure (MIS TLIF). According to the hypothesis, we assume that unilateral approach of MIS TLIF allows for adequate bilateral decompression of one-level central stenosis of the lumbar spine. Using MIS TLIF it is possible to perform reliable fixation of a spine segment and the formation of a complete intervertebral bone fusion. The long-term clinical results of surgical treatment with minimally invasive technologies (MIS TLIF) and traditional open approach (PLIF) suspected to be comparable.
Conditions
- Spinal Stenosis Lumbar Canal With Neurogenic Claudication (Diagnosis)
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Decompression
Bilateral decompression
- PROCEDURE
-
PLIF
Traditional open surgery
- PROCEDURE
-
MIS TLIF
On the one side - Wiltse approach, on the other side - percutaneous
- PROCEDURE
-
Screw Fixation
Transpedicular Screw Fixation
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan
lead OTHER_GOV
Principal Investigators
-
Aleksandr V Krutko, PhD, MD · Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan, Neurosurgery Department
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-11-15
- Primary Completion
- 2019-02-15
- Completion
- 2020-02-15
Countries
- Russia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Necessity of Fusion Following Decompression Surgery in Patients With Single-level Lumbar Stenosis
NCT05273879 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Preventive Effect of Limited Decompression on Adjacent Segment Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT04469387 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
MIS-D Versus MIS-TLIF for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT04318795 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Surgical Decompression Associated With Physical Therapy and Physical Therapy Isolated in Patients With Lumbar Stenosis.
NCT02879461 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study Between Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Treatment Modalities
NCT06686407 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Microdecompression Versus Open Laminectomy and Posterior Stabilization for Multilevel Lumbar Spine Stenosis
NCT04087694 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion(MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
NCT06749314 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Study on the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spine Stenosis With a Percutaneous Interspinous Implant
NCT01057641 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Spinal Stenosis
NCT00022776 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Canal Stenosis
NCT04254757 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Mini-Open TLIF vs Traditional Open TLIF
NCT07279051 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic Decompression Versus Microscopic Decompression in Lumbar Canal Stenosis
NCT06381167 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Indirect vs. Direct Decompression for Treatment of Central Stenosis: RCT
NCT04708977 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Minuteman Spinal Fusion Implant Versus Surgical Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT01455805 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison Between The Results of Open and Microsurgical Decompression in Degenerative Spinal Canal Stenosis in Lumbar Spine
NCT06722859 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Radiofrequency Nucleoplasty vs Percutaneous Nucleotomy vs Decompression Catheter in Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT00300898 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Microdecompression and Laminectomy for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT02006901 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparative Outcomes of Conventional TLIF With Posterior Decompression Surgery Versus Endoscopic Foraminotomy Surgery
NCT06685575 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors of Surgical and Non-surgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
NCT03548441 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Short-term Clinical Outcome of Cortical Bone Trajectory Compared With the Traditional "Open" and Minimal Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
NCT05538416 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis; Comparison of Two Different Surgical Methods; Mini-invasive Decompression to X-stop
NCT00546949 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Surgical Decompression With an Interlaminar Implant in Patients With Intermittent Neurogenic Claudication Caused by Lumbar Stenosis
NCT01727752 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Complications Rate and Treatment Costs of Mini-TLIF and MIDLIF in the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain
NCT07127380 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy With Lateral Mass Fixation in Management of Degenerative Cervical Canal Stenosis
NCT07177651 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Two Approaches in Cervical Single-door Laminoplasty for Spinal Canal Enlargement
NCT06941649 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA