The Effects of Different Non-invasive Respiratory Support

NCT07247318 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 60

Last updated 2025-11-25

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) typically present with pathophysiological alterations characterized by the coexistence of respiratory dysfunction and hypoxemia. Respiratory dysfunction leads to dyspnea, increased work of breathing, use of accessory respiratory muscles, and hypercapnia, while gas exchange impairment results in hypoxemia. Studies have shown that hypercapnia, acidosis, and hypoxemia can all enhance inspiratory effort, which further increases negative intrathoracic pressure. In these patients, regional differences in airway resistance and lung compliance are often present, causing redistribution of air within the lungs. This redistribution manifests as gas movement from non-dependent to dependent regions, known as "pendelluft," which amplifies regional alveolar strain and ventilation heterogeneity. This phenomenon becomes more pronounced during noninvasive respiratory support when spontaneous breathing is preserved.

Noninvasive respiratory support strategies mainly include high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO), noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV), and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). HFNO delivers high-flow gas through nasal cannulas, generating a certain level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and flushing out anatomical dead space to improve gas exchange, thereby reducing inspiratory effort, lowering the work of breathing, and enhancing oxygenation. NIV, typically using pressure support ventilation (NIV-PSV), is a patient-triggered, pressure-targeted mode that provides inspiratory positive pressure above PEEP. By augmenting tidal volume and reducing inspiratory effort, NIV improves gas exchange; however, leaks may limit the effective delivery of PEEP, and full inspiratory synchronization can increase transpulmonary driving pressure and tidal volume. CPAP, by contrast, delivers a constant positive pressure during both inspiration and expiration. Compared with HFNO, CPAP generates higher PEEP, which facilitates alveolar recruitment and more effectively improves oxygenation. Relative to NIV, CPAP may reduce transpulmonary driving pressure and tidal volume.

Different noninvasive respiratory support strategies exert varying effects on respiratory drive and regional lung strain, leading to differences in the occurrence and magnitude of pendelluft. Physiological studies have suggested that CPAP may offer greater benefits in improving oxygenation and reducing inspiratory effort; however, whether it can mitigate the occurrence and extent of pendelluft remains uncertain. Therefore, this study was conducted to visualize and quantitatively assess pendelluft in real time using electrical impedance tomography (EIT), aiming to verify whether CPAP has a superior effect in reducing pendelluft in patients with AHRF.

Conditions

  • Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF)

Interventions

DEVICE

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Patients were placed at a 45-degree supine position, and noninvasive ventilation was delivered to the patient through a face mask connected to an ICU ventilator. 2.PEEP was started at 5 cm H2O with a FiO2 of 0.5 at initiation. PEEP and FiO2 were titrated to maintain SpO2 between 94 and 98%, remaining constant for at least 5 min. 3.CPAP was initiated with a first session of at least 4 h, the minimally required duration of noninvasive ventilation was 16 hours per day for at least 2 calendar days. Between noninvasive-ventilation sessions, patients received HFNO.

DEVICE

Non-invasive ventilation

Patients were placed at a 45-degree supine position, and noninvasive ventilation was also delivered to the patient through a face mask connected to an ICU ventilator. The mask most appropriate for the patient will be selected and adjusted to minimize leakage and pressure points. 2. The inspiratory positive airway pressure (pressure support plus PEEP) was initiated between 12 and 14 cm H2O, PEEP was started at 5 cm H2O with a FiO2 of 0.5 at initiation. FiO2 was titrated to maintain SpO2 between 94 and 98%, remaining constant for at least 5 min. 3. NIV was initiated with a first session of at least 4 h, the minimally required duration of noninvasive ventilation was 16 hours per day for at least 2 calendar days. Between noninvasive-ventilation sessions, patients received HFNO.

DEVICE

High-flow nasal oxygen

Oxygen was passed through a heated humidifier (MR850, Fisher and Paykel Healthcare) and applied continuously through large-bore binasal prongs, with a gas flow rate of 50 liters per minute and an FiO2 of 0.5 at initiation. HFNO heating temperature was prespecified at 37°C. 2.FiO2 will be titrated to maintain SpO2 between 94 and 98%, remaining constant for at least 5 min. 3.HFNO was applied for at least 2 calendar days.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Southeast University, China

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2025-11-30
Primary Completion
2026-12-31
Completion
2026-12-31

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT07247318 on ClinicalTrials.gov