Robotic Emergency General Surgery Program
NCT07202442 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 30
Last updated 2025-10-01
Summary
Background Abdominal surgical emergencies account for 20-30% of visceral surgery procedures. However, these emergencies are responsible for more than half of the morbidity in our discipline, with a surgical site infection rate four times higher than in elective surgery, and significantly higher rates of surgical revision and conversion (PMID: 34225343 and 27016997 and 27120712). In cases where minimally invasive surgery is converted to laparotomy, patients are three times more likely to be admitted to critical care units (PMID: 39966134). Visceral surgery currently represents the largest and fastest-growing discipline in robotic surgery. Robotic management of emergency general surgery has been described in the literature for several years, particularly in the United States. Robotic surgery allows a shift from open procedures to minimally invasive techniques or simplifies complex laparoscopic procedures. Several literature reviews and meta-analyses report decreased laparotomy rates, reduced perioperative morbidity, and shorter average length of hospital stay (PMID: 38446451 and 38918109). Abdominal surgical emergencies account for 20-30% of visceral surgery procedures. However, these emergencies are responsible for more than half of the morbidity in our discipline, with a surgical site infection rate four times higher than in elective surgery, and significantly higher rates of surgical revision and conversion (PMID: 34225343 and 27016997 and 27120712). In cases where minimally invasive surgery is converted to laparotomy, patients are three times more likely to be admitted to critical care units (PMID: 39966134). Visceral surgery currently represents the largest and fastest-growing discipline in robotic surgery. Robotic management of emergency general surgery has been described in the literature for several years, particularly in the United States. Robotic surgery allows a shift from open procedures to minimally invasive techniques or simplifies complex laparoscopic procedures. Several literature reviews and meta-analyses report decreased laparotomy rates, reduced perioperative morbidity, and shorter average length of hospital stay (PMID: 38446451 and 38918109).Primary Objective:To assess the implementation of a robotic surgery program for emergency visceral procedures (proof of feasibility in our university hospital). Secondary Objectives: Reduce perioperative morbidity, Reduce the rate of laparotomy, Reduce the average length of hospital stay (LOS), Reduce postoperative admission to critical care, Reduce operative time.
Conditions
- Emergency General Surgery
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Emergency General surgery patients with robotic approach for the surgery
vPrimary Endpoint: The proportion of procedures performed robotically versus laparoscopically or via laparotomy for selected indications. Secondary Endpoints: A 5% change in perioperative morbidity, laparotomy rate, LOS, critical care admission rate, and operative time. Included Pathologies (for patients eligible for laparoscopy) : Acute cholecystitis with predictors of intraoperative difficulty. Bowel obstruction requiring bowel resection (in presence of CT signs of visceral compromise: poor enhancement of bowel loops, pneumoperitoneum). Complicated acute diverticulitis with perforation and peritonitis. Penetrating abdominal trauma with hemodynamic stability requiring surgery (e.g., bowel resection-anastomosis). Right or left colectomy for other etiologies. Splenectomy in hemodynamically stable or embolized patients.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-01-01
- Primary Completion
- 2027-11-30
- Completion
- 2027-12-31
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
National Multicenter Cohort Study of Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopy in Gastric Cancer
NCT06242613 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Parastomal Hernia of the Oncology Patient
NCT04950140 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Cost-effectivness of Robot-assisted Surgery Compared to Open Surgery for Partial Nephrectomy in Context of Renal Tumor
NCT05089006 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: a Target Trial Emulation
NCT06814093 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Functional Status and Quality of Life in Older Patients Undergoing Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT05848609 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic and Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT03500471 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective Study of Extended Robotic Right Hemicolectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision for Cancer
NCT04190589 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection
NCT02636673 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective Analysis of Robot-Assisted Surgery
NCT02292914 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Assisted Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery for Rectal Cancer in Low Site
NCT03422835 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Robotic Right Hemicolectomy Versus Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy
NCT06067620 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of SINGLE PORT (SP) Robotic Technology in Colorectal Surgery
NCT05321134 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Safety and Efficacy of Robotic Assisted Surgery Using Vessel Sealer Extend in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT06881043 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Prospective Registration Study of Robtic Laparoscopy Versus Laparoscopy Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery
NCT04843189 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Impact of Ambulatory Continuous Monitoring Using Remote Monitoring Medicine Within Patient's Care Pathway Following Colorectal Surgery (CONTACT-GRECCAR 21)
NCT06850688 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Carbon Footprint Assessment for Robotic, Laparoscopic and Open Colorectal Operations to Enhance Environmental Sustainability
NCT06844604 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Suprapubic Versus Transurethral Catheterization After Rectal Resection With Low Anastomosis for Cancer in Males
NCT02922647 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-assisted Left Hemicolectomy for Left Colon Cancer
NCT03696472 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Robot Surgery for Right-side Colon Cancer: Short-term Outcome of a Randomised Clinical Trial
NCT01042743 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Peri-Operative Surgical Care Optimisation for Patients Requiring Emergency Surgery
NCT06972017 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
da Vinci SP Robotic Gastrectomy
NCT05051670 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Emergency General Surgery for Non-trauma
NCT04539028 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Full Robotic Instrumentation and Assistant-Controlled Laparoscopic Instrumentation in Robotic Distal Gastrectomy
NCT06841484 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Understand the Utility of the Force Feedback Instruments in Robotic Procedures Using da Vinci 5 Robot
NCT06879912 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Comparison of the Application of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pathways in Radical Cystectomy
NCT06253091 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA