MedTrace Logo

Cost-effectivness of Robot-assisted Surgery Compared to Open Surgery for Partial Nephrectomy in Context of Renal Tumor

NCT05089006 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 400

Last updated 2021-10-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

This study aim to analyze cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted surgery compared to open surgery for partial nephrectomy in the context of renal tumor. A total of 400 patients were recruited in two centers in France corresponding to Reims(n=200) and Nancy hospital center (n=200). Patients recruited in Reims are corresponding to open surgery strategy, while patients of Nancy center are corresponding to robot-assisted surgery.

Costs analyzed included cost of intervention, hospital stay and complications. Effectiveness measure is corresponding to the rate of patients without acute complication at one year.

Conditions

  • Renal Tumor

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Partial nephrectomy with robot-assisted and open surgery

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is considered as a feasible minimally invasive alternative to open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for the surgical treatment of renal tumors. The main advantages of this technique include a three-dimensional magnified view of the surgical field, enhanced dexterity, and greater precision in both dissection and reconstruction.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Central Hospital, Nancy, France

    lead OTHER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2008-01-01
Primary Completion
2019-01-01
Completion
2021-06-01

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT05089006 on ClinicalTrials.gov