Gastric Microperfusion in Patients Undergoing Gastroesophageal Resections
NCT02077673 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2015-05-05
Summary
Gastroesophageal resection because of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma is a massive surgical intervention. Currently, gastroesophageal cancer surgery is performed with upper laparotomy followed by thoracotomy at the Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. However, minimal invasive techniques (MIT), e.g. robotic assisted laparoscopy, is in the progress of being implemented in this field as they are hypothesized to be more beneficial for the patients, and in some aspects better than conventional laparoscopic surgery.
The operative procedure is often complicated by low blood pressure (systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg is experienced in more than 30 % of the patients) and is probably accompanied by a reduced splanchnic microcirculatory flow, leading to increased morbidity. Hypotension may be due to several factors, among them are epidural analgesia, mesentery traction reflex, and inflammatory and vasoactive hormones.
Aim of the project
The aim of the project is, through a series of sub-projects, to validate or invalidate the relationship between changes in the microcirculatory blood flow in the stomach and the systemic hemodynamic changes. Furthermore, the aim is to assess the changes in the microcirculatory blood flow as a consequence of the thoracic epidural anesthesia. In addition, the aim is to assess the hypothesis that the mesenteric traction reflex and changes in the PGI2 levels may influence systemic hemodynamic changes, and that robotic assisted MIT will attenuate the mesenteric traction reflex and changes in PGI2 compared to open surgery.
Conditions
- Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
- Surgery
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Lars Bo Svendsen, prof., MD · Rigshospitalet, Denmark
-
Michael P Achiam, MD, PhD · Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2013-12-31
- Primary Completion
- 2015-01-31
- Completion
- 2015-04-30
Countries
- Denmark
More Related Trials
-
INtracorporeal Versus EXtracorporeal Anastomosis in Robotic Right Colectomy
NCT03130166 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Safety and Efficacy of Robotic Assisted Surgery Using Vessel Sealer Extend in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT06881043 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using Single-site for Surgical Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer
NCT02347956 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
National Multicenter Cohort Study of Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopy in Gastric Cancer
NCT06242613 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Preliminary Efficacy Analysis of 'λ+α' Double-Tract Reconstruction After Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy
NCT06475170 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Surgical,Clinical and Oncological Outcomes Between Robotic-assisted and Laparoscopic-assisted Gastrectomy
NCT02413476 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Comparison of Open Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Gastric Cancer Resection.
NCT03447106 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
NCT02248519 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of the Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy and Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT00741676 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE1
-
The Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With LPG-tbROSF Versus LTG for Localized Proximal Gastric Cancer.
NCT07260461 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Multi-institutional Study on the Assessment of Robotic Surgery for Gastric Cancer
NCT01309256 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT06202105 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Articulated Laparoscopic Instruments Clinical Study
NCT05550974 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Effect of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT02464215 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clinical Study on Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer (COACT_0301)
NCT00546468 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Prospective Study of Extended Robotic Right Hemicolectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision for Cancer
NCT04190589 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection
NCT02636673 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Minimally Invasive Right Colectomy Anastomosis Study
NCT03650517 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
da Vinci SP Robotic Gastrectomy
NCT05051670 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Comparison of Surgical Outcomes With Using Integrated Robotic Technology Versus Conventional Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer Surgery
NCT03396354 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: a Target Trial Emulation
NCT06814093 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
The Effect of Different Digestive Tract Reconstruction Methods on Postoperative Quality of Life After Proximal Gastrectomy
NCT06929949 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Learning Curve and Optimization of Robotic Gastrectomy
NCT05715775 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With Versus Without Bursectomy
NCT03117283 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Robotic-Assisted or Laparoscopic Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer With or Without Left Colic Artery Preservation
NCT06376227 ·Status: COMPLETED