To Evaluate the Performance and Efficiency of Robotic Surgery in Children and Adults
NCT03274050 · Status: RECRUITING · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 16000
Last updated 2025-11-20
Summary
Robotic minimally invasive surgery has been rapidly adopted for a wide variety of surgical procedures in adult patients across a broad spectrum of surgical specialties. This has occurred despite the high costs and uncertain benefits of surgical robots.
In contrast, Children's Hospitals and pediatric surgical disciplines have been much slower to embrace the surgical robot. Many children's hospitals do not even possess a surgical robot, and many of those that do borrow them from the adult operating room within the same medical facility.
Since the first case of robotic minimally invasive surgery in children in 2000, robotic procedures have been slowly adopted by select pediatric surgical specialists.
Advocates of robotic minimally invasive surgical systems add many useful features that include improved dexterity, motion scaling, tremor filtration, greater optical magnification (up to 10x), stereoscopic vision, operator-controlled camera movement, and the elimination of the fulcrum effect when compared to conventional laparoscopy. The wristed laparoscopic instruments used in robotic surgery provide seven degrees of freedom.
For the surgeon, these features may allow for more precise dissection with increased magnification and visibility. The intuitive controls of the robot are purported as providing the ability to perform laparoscopic procedures in an "open" fashion. In pediatric surgical procedures, these technical abilities may have the potential to surpass the physical capabilities of human performance in the tight operative fields encountered in children.
This study aims to evaluate the clinical safety and efficiency in a dedicated multidisciplinary pediatric program and to evaluate the relative cost of robotic surgery
Conditions
- Surgery
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Intuitive Surgical
collaborator INDUSTRY -
URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
collaborator OTHER -
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Thomas BLANC, MD; PhD · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
-
Morgane ROUPRET, MD, PhD · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2018-02-28
- Primary Completion
- 2029-08-31
- Completion
- 2029-08-31
Countries
- France
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for the Treatment of Parastomal Hernia of the Oncology Patient
NCT04950140 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Emergency General Surgery Program
NCT07202442 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Prospective Registration Study of Robtic Laparoscopy Versus Laparoscopy Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery
NCT04843189 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Prospective Comparison of Surgical Outcomes With Using Integrated Robotic Technology Versus Conventional Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer Surgery
NCT03396354 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-assisted Left Hemicolectomy for Left Colon Cancer
NCT03696472 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial to Assess Robot-assisted Surgery and Laparoscopy-assisted Surgery in Patients With Mid or Low Rectal Cancer
NCT01423214 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Comparison of Surgical,Clinical and Oncological Outcomes Between Robotic-assisted and Laparoscopic-assisted Gastrectomy
NCT02413476 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2/PHASE3
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: a Target Trial Emulation
NCT06814093 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
National Multicenter Cohort Study of Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopy in Gastric Cancer
NCT06242613 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Surgeon Ergonomics in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Vs Standard Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT04477746 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Robot Surgery for Right-side Colon Cancer: Short-term Outcome of a Randomised Clinical Trial
NCT01042743 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Comparison of Full Robotic Instrumentation and Assistant-Controlled Laparoscopic Instrumentation in Robotic Distal Gastrectomy
NCT06841484 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Evolving Use of Robotic Surgery
NCT05211128 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Robotic Assisted Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery for Rectal Cancer in Low Site
NCT03422835 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE2
-
The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using Single-site for Surgical Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer
NCT02347956 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Effectiveness of Robotic Surgery for Right Colon Cancer
NCT06421974 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Multi-institutional Study on the Assessment of Robotic Surgery for Gastric Cancer
NCT01309256 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Functional Status and Quality of Life in Older Patients Undergoing Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
NCT05848609 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Evaluation of Cornerstone Robotics Sentire Surgical System in Major Gastrointestinal and Urologic Surgery
NCT06926374 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Robot-assisted Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Resection: A Population-based Analysis of Prevalence, Trends and Outcomes
NCT06959849 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Laparoscopic Surgery Equivalent to Open Surgery in Right Colon Cancer Surgery?
NCT01772407 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Articulated Laparoscopic Instruments Clinical Study
NCT05550974 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Feasibility and Safety of Single Port Robot in Colorectal Procedures
NCT03700593 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Robotic and Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT03500471 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Prospective Registration Study of Totally Laparoscopy Versus Laparoscopy Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery
NCT04853784 ·Status: UNKNOWN