Comparison of Short- and Long-term Efficacy of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy in High-risk Patients With Gastric Cancer: a Nationwide, Multicentre Cohort Study
NCT06603272 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 534
Last updated 2024-09-19
Summary
Since 2007, robotic gastrectomy (RG) has been considered an option for minimally invasive surgery (MIS)1. In recent years, several randomised trials and retrospective studies have compared short-term efficacy and oncological outcomes between RG and laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG)2-5. Compared with traditional laparoscopic gastric surgery, RG may yield better short-term and comparable long-term outcomes4-6.
According to previous studies7, 8, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade ≥3, body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2, age ≥80 years, and clinical T4 stage are considered to be sensitive indicators for assessing surgical risk among patients with cancer. Patients with any of these factors were defined as high risk patients who constitute a special group. Previous research has shown that obesity, advanced age, comorbid conditions, and tumour cT stage are factors associated with mortality and complication rates in MIS for gastrointestinal malignancies6,7. Therefore, it is crucial to explore the impact of high-risk factors on prognosis. Many elderly patients have comorbidities with a high incidence of cardiopulmonary disease(s)8-10. Moreover, patients with poor baseline conditions often struggle to tolerate major surgery, and their comorbid state and ASA score are high-risk factors that affect postoperative complications and prognosis11-14. High BMI, especially among obese patients in whom excessive abdominal fat obscures anatomical regions, limits the flexibility of laparoscopic instruments, hinders complex perivascular lymph node dissection, and increases the difficulty of D2 lymphadenectomy, may increase postoperative complications15-17. Advanced-stage tumours, particularly those at the cT4 stage, present with more enlarged metastatic lymph nodes, making the exposure of vessels and dissection more challenging6,7. All of these factors are considered to be high-risk factors for surgical procedures. With the increasing prevalence of aging populations and obesity18-20, more high-risk patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC) are undergoing MIS.
To further explore this increasing concern about clinical practice, our study is the first to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of RG and LG in a high-risk gastric cancer population, with the aim of providing high-level, evidence-based medicine for the widespread application of RG in this population. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first multicentre, large-sample study to compare the advantages of RG and LG in a high-risk GC population.
Conditions
- Patients With More Than or Equal to One of the Following Criteria Were Defined as High-risk Patients
Interventions
- DEVICE
-
The da Vinci robotic system (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was used for all robotic gastrectomy
Surgical intervention was initiated after obtaining informed consent from all patients, which included the additional costs of robotic surgery, a comprehensive explanation of surgical risks, and potential alternative treatments, thus facilitating informed surgical approach choices (i.e., LG or RG) within the participating institutions. Adherence to the "Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines" was maintained for determining the extent of gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Fujian Medical University
lead OTHER
Eligibility
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2016-08-01
- Primary Completion
- 2019-06-05
- Completion
- 2023-06-15
- FDA Device
- Yes
More Related Trials
-
The Safety and Efficacy of Robotic Assisted Surgery Using Vessel Sealer Extend in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT06881043 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Effectiveness of Robotic Surgery for Right Colon Cancer
NCT06421974 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Prospective Comparison of Surgical Outcomes With Using Integrated Robotic Technology Versus Conventional Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer Surgery
NCT03396354 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Middle and Low Rectal Cancer: a Target Trial Emulation
NCT06814093 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Comparison of Open Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery in Gastric Cancer Resection.
NCT03447106 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Safety and Feasibility of Reduced Port Robotic Distal Gastrectomy Using Single-site for Surgical Treatment of Early Gastric Cancer
NCT02347956 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Comparison of Short- and Long-term Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Hemicolectomy of Right Colon Cancer : A Multicenter Propensity Score Matching Analysis
NCT07029464 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
-
Articulated Laparoscopic Instruments Clinical Study
NCT05550974 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Gastric Microperfusion in Patients Undergoing Gastroesophageal Resections
NCT02077673 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Multi-institutional Study on the Assessment of Robotic Surgery for Gastric Cancer
NCT01309256 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Robotic and Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT03500471 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Robotic-assisted Left Hemicolectomy for Left Colon Cancer
NCT03696472 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Study to Evaluate Safety and Feasibility of Robotic Liver Resection
NCT06353672 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
National Multicenter Cohort Study of Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopy in Gastric Cancer
NCT06242613 ·Status: ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
-
Reduced Port Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
NCT04295473 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
The Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With LPG-tbROSF Versus LTG for Localized Proximal Gastric Cancer.
NCT07260461 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Development of a Versatile Intra-operative On-screen Audiovisual Mentoring System Using TileproTM Program for Robotic Gastrectomy
NCT01319084 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Visceral Obesity in Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis
NCT06397053 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Trial
NCT00452751 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Prospective Registration Study of Robtic Laparoscopy Versus Laparoscopy Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery
NCT04843189 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
A Trial to Assess Robot-assisted Surgery and Laparoscopy-assisted Surgery in Patients With Mid or Low Rectal Cancer
NCT01423214 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision
NCT05457426 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Learning Curve and Optimization of Robotic Gastrectomy
NCT05715775 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
NCT06202105 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Robotic vs Laparoscopic Right Colon Cancer: a 10-year Single-center Retrospective Study
NCT06454253 ·Status: COMPLETED