Comparison of the Clinical Effects of Open, Closed, and Semi-close Hemorrhoidectomy.
NCT07196865 · Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 378
Last updated 2026-03-04
Summary
This study compares three different ways surgeons close the wound after removing hemorrhoids (piles): leaving it completely open, stitching it completely closed, or stitching only half of it closed (semi-closed). The goal is to see which method leads to faster healing, less pain, fewer complications, and better long-term results. Patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups. All patients will receive standard post-operative care. Researchers will measure healing time, pain levels, need for pain medication, hospital stay, complications, and check if hemorrhoids come back within one year.
Conditions
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
Open Hemorrhoidectomy
Patients in this group undergo a hemorrhoidectomy procedure where, after external stripping and internal ligation, the surgical wound is left entirely open without sutures to heal by secondary intention. All patients receive standard postoperative care including potassium permanganate rinses and povidone-iodine disinfection.
- PROCEDURE
-
Closed Hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson Technique)
Patients in this group undergo a hemorrhoidectomy procedure where, after achieving hemostasis, the entire surgical wound is closed primarily using interrupted non-absorbable sutures. All patients receive standard postoperative care including potassium permanganate rinses and povidone-iodine disinfection.
- PROCEDURE
-
Semi-Closed Hemorrhoidectomy
Patients in this group undergo a hemorrhoidectomy procedure where, after achieving hemostasis, the distal half of the incision (away from the anal canal) is closed with interrupted sutures, while the proximal half remains open. All patients receive standard postoperative care including potassium permanganate rinses and povidone-iodine disinfection.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University
lead OTHER
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- NONE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2026-04-01
- Primary Completion
- 2026-12-01
- Completion
- 2026-12-30
More Related Trials
-
Open Wide Excision Versus Minimal Surgery for Pilonidal Disease
NCT01241136 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Insitu Repair Versus Uterine Exeriorization During Cesarean Section
NCT01723605 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Subcuticular Continuous Suture Versus Skin Staples to Reduce Surgical Site Infections in Colorectal Surgery Patients
NCT02143336 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Optimal Method of Fascial Closure in High Risk Patients Undergoing Laparotomy
NCT02145052 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Sutures vs. Staples Skin Closure After C-section in Obese Patients
NCT01820221 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Surgical Incision Complications in Patients Receiving PICO or Standard Care Following Colorectal Surgery
NCT02883010 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Closure Methods for Laparoscopic Port Sites
NCT00466648 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Primary Closure vs Open Technique for Pilonidal Sinus
NCT07311707 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomized Trial on the Technical Aspects of Stoma Construction.
NCT01694238 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Subcuticular Suture Versus Staples for Closure of the Skin After Caesarean Section.
NCT01217567 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
SUTURE-CLOSURE OMENTOPEXY VERSUS OMENTOPEXY ALONE IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER
NCT06550856 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Small Bite Technique Versus Standardised Large Bites Technique in Closure of Midline Laparotomies.
NCT04788875 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Suture Versus Staples for Wound Closure in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery
NCT06586814 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Secondary Versus Tertiary Wound Closure in High Risk Gynecologic Abdominal Surgical Incisions
NCT03861065 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
the Method of Cotton Padding Promoting the Rectovaginal Fistula Surgery
NCT05138965 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Versus Surgical Staples for Closure of Pfannenstiel Skin Incisions
NCT00186732 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Study of Harmonic Scalpel vs. Suture Ligation for Appendix Base During Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT07049965 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Small-bite Versus Conventional Midline Fascial Closure in Abdominal Surgeries
NCT07340918 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgical Repair of Genitovesical Fistula in Females
NCT07043062 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Sutures Versus Glue in Laparoscopic Port Site Closure.
NCT03843866 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Clipping Versus No Hair Removal and the Risk of Surgical Site Infections
NCT00975377 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Continuous Suturing Versus Interrupted Clips for Brachiocephalic AV Fistula Creation
NCT03024372 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Trial Comparing Stapled Versus Monocryl Sutured Skin Closure for Elective Open Colectomy
NCT01907542 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Closure vs Non Closure of Rectus Muscle at Cesarean Section 5 Year Study
NCT04548570 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
A Study Comparing Skin Adhesive With Staple for Surgical Incision Closure After Laparoscopic / Robotic Bowel Resection
NCT04969016 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA